Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | STEVENS Daniel | - | - | 5% | 25% | 46% | 24% | |
| 2 | WU Byron | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 3 | TREBON Hayden | - | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 5% |
| 3 | JIN Owen | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
| 5 | JACKSON James | 1% | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 6 | BORODITSKY Ethan | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 14% | |
| 7 | WANG Tristan | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
| 8 | BEACH Nicholas | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
| 9 | PARK Frederick | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
| 10 | PARK Vincent | - | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 11 | SCHULZE Ethan | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
| 12 | WHITEHURST JJ | - | 6% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 3% | |
| 13 | DUDLEY Logan M. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 14 | WU Jonathan | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 15 | DOLMETSCH Max | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
| 16 | HORTELANO Ethan | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
| 17 | JOSEPH William | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% | |
| 18 | HE Lawrence | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 33% | 9% | |
| 19 | LURVEY Samuel | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 20 | WANG Clayton | 1% | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 21 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | |
| 22 | LIN Harrison | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | GISLER Benjamin B. | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
| 24 | BLUM Oliver | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
| 25 | VALES Keyan | 1% | 10% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | |
| 26 | KUCZAJDA Matthew | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% | |
| 27 | LEE JoonWon | 33% | 48% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 28 | MATTO Edward J. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | |
| 29 | BERKOWITZ Jeffrey | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 30 | COETZEE Frans M. | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 31 | SNYDER Ari | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 32 | PAN Colin | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | PARNAS Ely | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
| 34 | KIM Ryan | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | 2% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 36 | ZHANG Richard | 33% | 48% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 37 | JEON Hwidong | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 38 | FU Ethan | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 39 | MILLER Kurt | 40% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | ZHANG Andy | 11% | 45% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | WANG Trontour | 57% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | TAHOUN Aly | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 43 | ANDERSON Donald | 59% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.