Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | STEVENS Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 24% | |
2 | WU Byron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% | |
3 | TREBON Hayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 32% | 5% |
3 | JIN Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% |
5 | JACKSON James | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
6 | BORODITSKY Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | |
7 | WANG Tristan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
8 | BEACH Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | |
9 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
10 | PARK Vincent | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
11 | SCHULZE Ethan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
12 | WHITEHURST JJ | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 23% | 3% | |
13 | DUDLEY Logan M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% | |
14 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | - | |
15 | DOLMETSCH Max | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | |
16 | HORTELANO Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% | |
17 | JOSEPH William | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 11% | |
18 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 9% | |
19 | LURVEY Samuel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
20 | WANG Clayton | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
21 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
22 | LIN Harrison | 100% | 70% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
23 | GISLER Benjamin B. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
24 | BLUM Oliver | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% | |
25 | VALES Keyan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | |
26 | KUCZAJDA Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% | |
27 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 67% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
28 | MATTO Edward J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% | |
29 | BERKOWITZ Jeffrey | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
30 | COETZEE Frans M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
31 | SNYDER Ari | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
32 | PAN Colin | 100% | 87% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | |
33 | PARNAS Ely | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
34 | KIM Ryan | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
35 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
36 | ZHANG Richard | 100% | 67% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
37 | JEON Hwidong | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - | |
38 | FU Ethan | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
39 | MILLER Kurt | 100% | 60% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
40 | ZHANG Andy | 100% | 89% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
41 | WANG Trontour | 100% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
42 | TAHOUN Aly | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
43 | ANDERSON Donald | 100% | 41% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.