Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | |
| 2 | MOHAMED Amir | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 6% |
| 3 | LEE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% |
| 3 | GAO William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 5 | OH SEAN | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% | |
| 6 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 7 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% | |
| 8 | KUMAMOTO Sota | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 4% | |
| 9 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 26% |
| 10 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% | 1% |
| 11 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 12 | WANG Winston | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 13 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | |
| 14 | PO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 15 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 15% | 1% |
| 16 | LIU Eric Y. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
| 17 | LEE Jacob | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 18 | MOHAMED Murad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 55% | 13% |
| 19 | KNIZHNIK David | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 32% | 3% | |
| 20 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | |
| 21 | TANG Owen S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
| 22 | SONG Bryan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 23 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
| 24 | WOO Christian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 9% | |
| 25 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
| 26 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 27 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 15% |
| 28 | KLYCZEK Andrew | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 29 | WANG Brayden | 100% | 99% | 81% | 28% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 100% | 93% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | ALONSO Vinicius | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 32 | LEE Lukas | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
| 33 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | 16% | 2% |
| 34 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 9% |
| 35 | SONG Austin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 36 | PAN Henry | 100% | 80% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | PITERBARG Maxim | 100% | 100% | 91% | 58% | 18% | 1% | |
| 38 | DE COQUET Maximilian | 100% | 99% | 80% | 38% | 8% | - | |
| 39 | HUANG Eythan | 100% | 99% | 75% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 40 | TANG Albert | 100% | 94% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 41 | LIANG David | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
| 42 | POLONSKI Anthony | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 43 | QIAN Jason H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 44 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 45 | RNO Kyler | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | TANG August L. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 47 | DANIZ T FERNANDO A. | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 48 | KETTELLE John | 100% | 93% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 49 | MAO Lucas | 100% | 83% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 51 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 74% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | HAN Derek | 100% | 84% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | SEMP Iain | 100% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 54 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 54 | YAP Nathan | 100% | 89% | 52% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | QUINN Nathan | 100% | 45% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 57 | DUNLAP Ian | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 58 | PRICE Owen | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | WATSON Logan | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.