Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | GRAHAM Roy J. | V D V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
2 | GRIFFIN John O. | V V V V D V | V V V V V D | 5.8 | 5 | -0.8 |
3 | ONIK Elijah T. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
3 | KWON Ethan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
5 | XIAO Ethan J. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
6 | BUERGIN Aidan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 6 | +2.9 |
8 | RITCHIE Luke W. | V D V V V D | V V V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
9 | SCHENCK Koen M. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
10 | LOCKWOOD Owen | V V V V V V | V V | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
11 | GU Jeffrey | V V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
12 | DAI Jonathan T. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
13 | XIAO Enoch A. | D V V V V D | V V D | 5.4 | 4 | -1.4 |
14 | LEE Aidan | V V V D V D | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
15 | ARIZA Isaac A. | V D V D D V | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
16 | WAN Jason | D V D V D D | V V D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
17 | LEUNG Wai Chi Ethan | D V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
18 | JEON Caleb A. | D V D V V V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
19 | BELLUOMO David C. | V V V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
20 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | V D D V V V | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
21 | SONG Leonardo T. | V V D V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
21 | CHENG Nathan | V V V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
23 | GRISWOLD Abel B. | V V D V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
24 | RINEHART Conner M. | V D V D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
25 | NEWELL Ian A. | D V V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
26 | LUH Ethan K. | D V D V V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
27 | KEE Andrew L. | V V D V D D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
28 | FU Samuel Y. | V D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
29 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | D D D V V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
30 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | V D D D V V | V | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
31 | LIN Richard W. | D V D D V | V D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
32 | BAE Kevin | D V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
33 | WALTER Evran M. | D V V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
34 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | V V D D V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
35 | WU Alexander | V D D V V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
36 | SONG Bryan | V V V D V D | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
37 | CHOI Samuel | D D V V V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
38 | HSIUNG Richie | V V V V D | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
39 | YANG Luao | V V V D D V | D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
40 | LEE Lukas | V V V V D D | D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
41 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | D D V V V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
42 | CAI Oliver K. | V V D V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
43 | GAO William | V D V D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
44 | REEVES Liam | V D D V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
45 | UPTON Craig | V D V D D V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
46 | DING Jonathan | V V D V D D | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
47 | KOBAL Maximilian | V V D D V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
48 | ZHAI Jeffrey | D V D V D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
49 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | D D V D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
50 | LEE Jacob | D D V V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
51 | XIAO Anthony | V D V D D D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
52 | OH SEAN | D D V D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
53 | WU Nicholas | D D D D V V | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 | |
54 | YU Jonathan J. | D V D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
55 | ZHAO Dylan L. | D D V V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
56 | KLYCZEK Andrew | V D D D V D | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
56 | BERNABE Rafael | D D V V D D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
58 | WECHSLER Jacob | D D V D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
59 | WOO Christian | D D D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
60 | GAUTAM Vishnu | D D D D V D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
61 | EMENHEISER Conrad | D D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
62 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | V D D D D D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
63 | HOBSON Aaron K. | D D D D D D | V D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
64 | PRASANNA Advaith | D D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
65 | MILLER Aidan A. | D D D D V V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
66 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | D V D D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
67 | TIAN Aaron C. | D D V D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
68 | ZHENG zhe | D D D V D D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 | |
69 | ROUNTREE Rob | D V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
70 | LE Vyn A. | D D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
71 | WANG Brayden | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
72 | VIVEROS Antonio | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
73 | LI Ryan Z. | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
74 | JOHNSON Zachary R. | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
75 | DRESSEL Jet | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.