King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | BAS Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% |
| 2 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 28% |
| 3 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% |
| 3 | AHN Jun | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 9% |
| 5 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 36% |
| 6 | ONIK Elijah T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 7 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 34% |
| 8 | HAN Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 22% | 3% |
| 9 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 6% |
| 10 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 18% |
| 11 | LE Vyn A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% |
| 12 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% |
| 13 | FU Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
| 14 | LEE Jacob J | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
| 15 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 29% |
| 16 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | BADLANI Dev | 100% | 94% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 18 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 19 | MOHAMED Amir | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 22% | 3% |
| 20 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 96% | 66% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 21 | MOHAMED Murad | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 22 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
| 23 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | 100% | 100% | 85% | 43% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | PO Oliver | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 90% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 26 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 100% | 92% | 58% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 27 | HOWARD Michael | 100% | 99% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 28 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 29 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 30 | TALLARICO Matthew | 100% | 87% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 31 | MILLER Aidan A. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 32 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 26% | 3% |
| 33 | WANG Jackson | 100% | 99% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 34 | BAUMANN Gunnar | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | TRUBETSKI David | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 37 | LEVIN Daniel | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 38 | SONG Bryan | 100% | 94% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 39 | DOUGLASS Viktor | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | BASAK Ashton R. | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | POIROT Max | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 42 | DAS Nikhil | 100% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.