New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | DAI Jonathan T. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
2 | LEE Jacob J | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
3 | RUSADZE Nickolas | V D V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
3 | AHN Jun | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
5 | JIANG Owen | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
6 | SHIN Joshua J. | V D V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
7 | MOHAMED Amir | V V V V D D | V V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
8 | SONG Bryan | D V D V V | V V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
9 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
10 | DAVIDSON Elliot | V V V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
11 | GUERRERO Isaac C. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
12 | LIN James G. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
13 | MENG Zhaoyi | V D V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
14 | ZHAI Jeffrey | D V D V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
15 | MOHAMED Murad | D V D V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
16 | YOON DYLAN | D V D V V D | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
17 | GONG Benjamin | V V V V V | D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
18 | ZHEN Ethan | V D V V V V | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
19 | LI Eric | D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
20 | WANG Mason | V V V D D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
21 | ALIMI Yacine A. | V V D V V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
22 | LEE Jonah | V V D D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
23 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | D V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
24 | LI Ayren | V V D D V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
25 | KLOTZ Isaiah | V V V D D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
26 | SIMA Congyu Josh | V D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
27 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | V V D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
28 | LEWIS Akhil | V D V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
29 | TALLARICO Matthew | D V D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
30 | GUO Justin | D D V D D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
31 | PLASTARAS Trey | D V D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
32 | MILLER Jordan | D D D V V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
33 | WANG Jackson | V V V D D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
34 | MATSAKH Philip | V D V D V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
34 | RNO Kyler | V V D V D D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
36 | XU Ethan | D V D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
37 | WU Michael | D D V V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
38 | LORANGER Peter | D D V D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
39 | REZA Farazi | D D V D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
40 | MORGESON Colin | D D D V D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
41 | SHAO Eric | D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
42 | RUIZ ALMEIDA Salahudin | V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
43 | KAPOOR Aayan | D D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
44 | TSAI Max W. | D V D D D D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
44 | LI Aaron | D D D V D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
46 | POPE Alexander | D D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
47 | EBERMAN Henry | V D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
48 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | D V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
49 | FRANK Amir | D D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
50 | WU Benjamin | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
51 | SHAPIRO Leon | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
52 | GREENLEAF Paul | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
53 | MCQUIDE elliot | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
53 | BRATTAIN Trey | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.