New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DAI Jonathan T. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 42% | 40% |
| 2 | LEE Jacob J | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 27% |
| 3 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 56% |
| 3 | AHN Jun | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 42% | 44% |
| 5 | JIANG Owen | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 7% |
| 6 | SHIN Joshua J. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 50% | 27% | |
| 7 | MOHAMED Amir | - | - | - | 4% | 24% | 46% | 25% |
| 8 | SONG Bryan | - | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 3% | |
| 9 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 45% |
| 10 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 11 | GUERRERO Isaac C. | - | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 12 | LIN James G. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% |
| 13 | MENG Zhaoyi | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 29% | 6% |
| 14 | ZHAI Jeffrey | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% |
| 15 | MOHAMED Murad | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 40% | 10% |
| 16 | YOON DYLAN | 1% | 11% | 38% | 37% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 17 | GONG Benjamin | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% | |
| 18 | ZHEN Ethan | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 41% | 12% |
| 19 | LI Eric | - | - | 4% | 24% | 46% | 27% | |
| 20 | WANG Mason | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | ALIMI Yacine A. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 32% | 7% |
| 22 | LEE Jonah | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 23 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
| 24 | LI Ayren | 1% | 8% | 34% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 25 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 3% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 26 | SIMA Congyu Josh | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% | |
| 27 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 28 | LEWIS Akhil | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 29 | TALLARICO Matthew | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 30 | GUO Justin | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 31 | PLASTARAS Trey | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | MILLER Jordan | 13% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 33 | WANG Jackson | - | 9% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% | |
| 34 | MATSAKH Philip | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | RNO Kyler | 2% | 24% | 43% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 36 | XU Ethan | 5% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | WU Michael | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | LORANGER Peter | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 39 | REZA Farazi | - | 10% | 34% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 40 | MORGESON Colin | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | SHAO Eric | 5% | 38% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | RUIZ ALMEIDA Salahudin | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% | |
| 43 | KAPOOR Aayan | 3% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | TSAI Max W. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 44 | LI Aaron | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 46 | POPE Alexander | 9% | 38% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | EBERMAN Henry | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 48 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | FRANK Amir | 25% | 49% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 50 | WU Benjamin | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | SHAPIRO Leon | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | GREENLEAF Paul | 43% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | MCQUIDE elliot | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | BRATTAIN Trey | 71% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.