Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LONCAR Luka E. | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
2 | GOHEL Dayus T. | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 27% |
3 | PRIHODKO Max | - | - | 5% | 30% | 42% | 19% | 3% |
3 | RICHARD Owen | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 20% |
5 | MACARTY Jordan T. | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 44% | 18% |
6 | LANGTON Sawyer | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 11% |
7 | KIM Tei D. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 40% | 13% |
8 | CHOI Mason | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
9 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 42% |
10 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | - | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
11 | JUN Jaywu | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 31% | 7% |
12 | TIYA Biaya K. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 23% |
13 | ZHAO corey | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
14 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 25% |
15 | CHEN Jun Ho | 1% | 8% | 31% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - |
16 | WOLFE Alex | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 5% | - |
17 | VEZMAR Evan H. | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 46% | 28% |
18 | JOSLIN Tyler | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
19 | WU Jonathan | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
20 | IARIKOV Nicholas | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
21 | KHANNA Nikhil | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
22 | JIANG Bryan | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
23 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
24 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
25 | JIN Derek | 10% | 34% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
26 | ZHANG William | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
27 | RIPA Joseph K. | 3% | 26% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
28 | KUBATIN Anton V. | 26% | 45% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
29 | SKORUPAN Grant | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
30 | SONG Troy | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
31 | FENG du | 63% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
32 | XIE Brandon | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
33 | BRADSHAW Carter | 19% | 44% | 30% | 7% | - | - | - |
34 | PETERSEN Zachary | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
35 | KIM Nathan | 5% | 33% | 45% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.