Anaheim, CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | THEIN-SANDLER Adrien (Adi) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
| 2 | POLAKOSKI David R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
| 3 | SODERBERG Alex Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 3 | JEONG Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
| 5 | DAO Matthew M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
| 6 | DIEDERICHS Jimmy G. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 7 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 10% |
| 8 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
| 9 | DOLMETSCH Max | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 10 | CHIEN Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 33% |
| 11 | JEON Alexander E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 12 | SHARMA Sanil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 13 | ISAAC Mena | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | KIM Aaron J. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 15 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% |
| 16 | WESTPHAL David R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 7% |
| 17 | ELASHRY Zeyad A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% |
| 18 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
| 19 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 20 | CHIEN Zachary M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 21 | ROBINSON Riley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
| 22 | CANDELA Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 23 | BENACK Steven M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% |
| 24 | CAI Kevin P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 22% |
| 25 | KIM Sterling S. | 100% | 96% | 71% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 26 | MA Victor | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 27 | WEAVER Neil | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 28 | TARBUSKOVICH III John | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 29 | LEE Matthew C. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 30 | LOGUE Ethan D. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 31 | BOYCE Samuel H. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 32 | WALL Peter M. | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | ZHU Wilson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 14% |
| 34 | SMITH Justin C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 14% |
| 35 | TSANG Lok Hin Gary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 11% |
| 36 | ZHENG Haoran | 100% | 76% | 33% | 8% | 1% | < 1% | - |
| 37 | JAIN Sarthak | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 38 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
| 39 | DOAN Joseph M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
| 40 | PAEK Alex J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 41 | GAINES Aaron | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 42 | KOPPE Alexander | 100% | 96% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 43 | ZHU Max | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 8% |
| 43 | BURTON Patrick | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 45 | LEVY Zachari I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 46 | CAI Brian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 47 | GOMEZ Isaac | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 48 | MADSEN Jr Eric W. | 100% | 87% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | COMER Daniel T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% |
| 50 | GALLO James | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 51 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 52 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 49% | 12% |
| 53 | JIN Daniel | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 54 | AHN Gus | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 55 | WIEGAND-SHAHANI Braden M. | 100% | 85% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | YAO Shun | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 57 | RITCHIE Phillip | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 58 | BUI James H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% |
| 59 | LO Hung Yui | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 60 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | 100% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 61 | ZHANG Alec | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 62 | JENSEN David | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 63 | LOEFFLER Carl E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
| 64 | LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 65 | WANG owen | 100% | 89% | 49% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | SOOHOO Jackson F. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 67 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 67 | USHER Alexander | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 69 | MOHEBI Saam | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 70 | PHUKAN Rohin | 100% | 88% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 72 | COOPER Rowan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 73 | LEE Chun Po | 100% | 50% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 74 | FAN Beichen | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 75 | COMER Alexander J. | 100% | 86% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 76 | GU Aidan | 100% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 77 | LEE Richard U. | 100% | 77% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 78 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 79 | GAURIAT Olivier | 100% | 56% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 80 | LOGUE Andrew E. | 100% | 64% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 80 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 80 | CRAFT Marshall | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 83 | CHUANG Kenneth H. | 100% | 88% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.