The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

NEUSFA Tom Gorman Beanpot Open

Senior Men's Épée

Sunday, February 27, 2022 at 12:00 PM

Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 LONCAR Luka E. V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.5 6 +0.5
2 ZHAO Corey V V D V V V V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
3 DOELEMAN Zeno V D V V V V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
3 WU Joseph V V V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
5 JONES Simon A. V V V V V V V V V D 5.8 6 +0.2
6 RICHARD Owen V V V V V V V V V D 4.9 6 +1.1
7 SHAH Maximilian A. V V V V V D V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
8 SAVORETTI Francesco D V V D D D V V V D 3.7 2 -1.7
9 GOHEL Dayus T. V V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
10 RICUTA Laurentiu Florentin V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
11 COLLYMORE Spencer T. V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
12 FERGUSON Magnus K. V V D V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
13 LAI Coby V V V D V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
14 BOYNTON Zachariah (Zach) G. V V V V D V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
15 MACARTY Jordan T. D V V V V D V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
16 ZHANG William V D V D V V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
17 CHOI Aleksey V V V V V V V D 3.4 6 +2.6
18 MELCHER Jack H. D V V V V V V D 5.0 5 -
19 LAI Aedin V V D V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
20 PAPAVASSILIOU Christos V V D V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
21 PRIHODKO Max V D V V D V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
22 ROUSE Brian G. V V V D D V V D 4.0 4 -
23 IORIO Max V D V V V D V D 2.6 4 +1.4
24 GERSEN Jacob D V D V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
25 OSTIGUY Cameron D V D V V V V D 1.9 4 +2.1
26 MATEI Daniel V V D V V D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
27 SKAALAND Will V D V D V D V D 3.6 3 -0.6
28 HERMANSON David B. D V D V D V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
29 SANCHEZ Leon D. V V D V D D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
30 GUI Runlin V D D D V V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
31 MARSHALL William L. D V V D D D V D 3.9 2 -1.9
32 XIE Brandon V D D D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
33 WALTON Cameron L. D V V V V V 3.6 5 +1.4
34 WU Jonathan V V V D V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
35 HANCOCK Lloyd D. D D V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
36 CAFASSO Martin D D V V V D D 1.8 3 +1.2
37 ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. V D D V V D D 2.9 3 +0.1
38 ROLLO Emmett H. V V D V D D D 3.4 3 -0.4
39 WHITE Nicholas F. D D D V V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
40 VALAYANNOPOULOS Nicolas V D V D D V D 1.7 3 +1.3
41 SANTOS Felipe V V D V D D D 3.5 3 -0.5
42 ZHANG William V D V D D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
43 RYAN Joshua P. D D V V D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
44 MILGRAM Aaron D V V D D V D 1.0 3 +2.0
45 QUINLAN Sean D V V D V D D 3.2 3 -0.2
46 SPRINGER Michael D V V D D D D 4.2 2 -2.2
47 GONG Haixiang D V D V D D D 2.5 2 -0.5
48 SONG Troy D V V D D D D 2.0 2 -
49 HU Jansen T. D V D D D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
50 WANG justin V D D V D D D 1.6 2 +0.4
51 EANG Brynner D V D D V D D 1.0 2 +1.0
52 SANTOS Antonio K. D D V D D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
53 CHU Wenxi D D D D V D D 0.8 1 +0.2
54 PAGE Duncan D D D D D V D 2.0 1 -1.0
55 GAVIN Liam D D D V D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
56 PEZZINO Matthew D D D D D V D 1.9 1 -0.9
57 SACCOMANNO Shelby D D D D V D D 0.7 1 +0.3
58 KAIN Brad D D D V D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
59 SANTOS Francisco M. D D D D D V V D 1.6 1 -0.6
60 IORIO Matthew D D D V D D V D 3.2 1 -2.2
61 ROSENBLUM Addison J. D D D D D V V D 0.9 1 +0.1
62 SMEDLEY Drew N. D D D D D D V D 2.6 0 -2.6
63 MACNEILL Owen D D D D D D V D 1.7 0 -1.7
64 SEOL Austin D D D D D D V D 1.6 0 -1.6
65 ZHANG Roland D V D D D D D 0.6 1 +0.4
66 GRAYSON Joshua D D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
67 BUTTS Brendan D D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
68 LIU Jeremiah W. D D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
69 MARINI Davide D D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
70 ZOU Xianyang D D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.