The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

NEUSFA Tom Gorman Beanpot Open

Senior Men's Épée

Sunday, February 27, 2022 at 12:00 PM

Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LONCAR Luka E. - - - 1% 7% 34% 58%
2 ZHAO Corey - - 1% 9% 29% 42% 19%
3 DOELEMAN Zeno - - - 3% 18% 45% 34%
3 WU Joseph - - - 1% 11% 42% 45%
5 JONES Simon A. - - - - 1% 16% 83%
6 RICHARD Owen - - 1% 6% 24% 43% 26%
7 SHAH Maximilian A. - - 1% 7% 25% 42% 26%
8 SAVORETTI Francesco - 1% 10% 30% 38% 18% 3%
9 GOHEL Dayus T. - - - 4% 20% 43% 33%
10 RICUTA Laurentiu Florentin - - - 1% 13% 46% 40%
11 COLLYMORE Spencer T. - - - 3% 16% 43% 38%
12 FERGUSON Magnus K. - - 3% 14% 34% 35% 13%
13 LAI Coby - 1% 6% 22% 39% 29% 5%
14 BOYNTON Zachariah (Zach) G. - - 1% 9% 31% 43% 16%
15 MACARTY Jordan T. - - - 6% 28% 45% 20%
16 ZHANG William - - 2% 13% 35% 40% 9%
17 CHOI Aleksey - 2% 13% 40% 34% 10% 1%
18 MELCHER Jack H. - - - 4% 20% 43% 33%
19 LAI Aedin - 3% 20% 39% 29% 9% 1%
20 PAPAVASSILIOU Christos - - 4% 22% 39% 28% 6%
21 PRIHODKO Max - - 5% 28% 43% 21% 3%
22 ROUSE Brian G. - - 5% 22% 39% 27% 6%
23 IORIO Max 1% 11% 32% 37% 16% 3% -
24 GERSEN Jacob - 3% 14% 32% 34% 15% 2%
25 OSTIGUY Cameron 9% 29% 36% 21% 6% 1% -
26 MATEI Daniel - 4% 19% 37% 30% 10% -
27 SKAALAND Will - 1% 10% 36% 38% 14% 1%
28 HERMANSON David B. - 1% 8% 27% 42% 20% 2%
29 SANCHEZ Leon D. 1% 11% 28% 34% 20% 5% -
30 GUI Runlin - 1% 9% 30% 38% 19% 3%
31 MARSHALL William L. - - 6% 28% 42% 21% 3%
32 XIE Brandon 5% 25% 40% 24% 6% 1% -
33 WALTON Cameron L. - 2% 11% 31% 35% 18% 3%
34 WU Jonathan - 1% 9% 29% 39% 20% 1%
35 HANCOCK Lloyd D. - 5% 20% 35% 28% 10% 1%
36 CAFASSO Martin 7% 31% 41% 18% 3% - -
37 ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 6% -
38 ROLLO Emmett H. - 3% 17% 33% 31% 14% 2%
39 WHITE Nicholas F. 5% 19% 32% 28% 13% 3% -
40 VALAYANNOPOULOS Nicolas 9% 34% 37% 16% 3% - -
41 SANTOS Felipe - 1% 13% 34% 35% 15% 2%
42 ZHANG William 1% 8% 29% 36% 20% 5% -
43 RYAN Joshua P. - 4% 19% 37% 29% 10% 1%
44 MILGRAM Aaron 28% 47% 21% 4% - - -
45 QUINLAN Sean - 5% 20% 37% 29% 9% -
46 SPRINGER Michael - - 3% 18% 40% 32% 6%
47 GONG Haixiang 3% 15% 32% 33% 15% 3% -
48 SONG Troy 7% 25% 35% 24% 8% 1% -
49 HU Jansen T. 1% 12% 32% 35% 17% 3% -
50 WANG justin 9% 38% 40% 12% 1% - -
51 EANG Brynner 33% 43% 20% 4% - - -
52 SANTOS Antonio K. 9% 34% 41% 14% 2% - -
53 CHU Wenxi 42% 42% 14% 2% - - -
54 PAGE Duncan 5% 25% 39% 24% 6% 1% -
55 GAVIN Liam 22% 43% 28% 7% 1% - -
56 PEZZINO Matthew 8% 28% 36% 21% 6% 1% -
57 SACCOMANNO Shelby 47% 42% 11% 1% - - -
58 KAIN Brad 10% 36% 36% 15% 3% - -
59 SANTOS Francisco M. 10% 38% 38% 12% 2% - -
60 IORIO Matthew - 6% 21% 34% 27% 10% 1%
61 ROSENBLUM Addison J. 32% 47% 19% 2% - - -
62 SMEDLEY Drew N. 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3% -
63 MACNEILL Owen 6% 39% 40% 13% 2% - -
64 SEOL Austin 10% 36% 37% 15% 2% - -
65 ZHANG Roland 52% 38% 9% 1% - - -
66 GRAYSON Joshua 42% 42% 14% 2% - - -
67 BUTTS Brendan 36% 47% 15% 2% - - -
68 LIU Jeremiah W. 39% 51% 10% 1% - - -
69 MARINI Davide 11% 32% 35% 17% 4% - -
70 ZOU Xianyang 28% 47% 22% 3% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.