Strength Ranking

Men's Epee, Birth Year 2002

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate*
Cons. Est.*
180-day
Trend
Rating
1 Lawson, Nicholas 3977 3703 - A24
2 Haddad, Justin 3876 3611 - A22
3 Shifron, Daniel 3671 3290 - A20
4 Merchant, Reza 3516 3160 - B23
5 Xu, Timothy (Tingwei) 3552 3152 - A23
6 Gaidar, Daniel 3463 3110 - A22
7 Marchant, Albert 3343 3058 36 B25
8 Spier, Julian 3326 3042 22 A25
9 Kumar, Anitya 3271 2999 - A21
10 Walsh, Kevin 3287 2978 - A21
11 Kang, Michael 3244 2956 - B24
12 Westphal, David 3254 2901 44 A24
13 Brunet, Nathan 3292 2872 - B24
14 Bodon, Michele 3231 2862 - B24
15 Meinhold, Li 3211 2856 28 A24
16 Kokenge, Clark 3149 2855 - B23
17 Zubeck, Dominic 3154 2795 6 A24
18 Peters, Nathan 3149 2774 10 A22
19 Kenyon, Jacob 3180 2758 7 A23
20 Menegoli, Lorenzo 3114 2752 50 A25
21 Wang, Nathan 3087 2745 - A18
22 Schultz, Alex 3093 2682 - B25
23 Steele, DeMario 3072 2673 - B24
24 Garcia-Rogers, Kyle 3148 2670 - B21
25 Diederichs, Jimmy 3160 2631 - A21
26 Walker, Weymouth 2952 2583 - A20
27 Dolmetsch, Max 2864 2570 18 B25
28 Ma, Victor 2802 2518 - A23
29 Tarbuskovich III, John 2873 2492 - C21
30 Juscinski, Michal 2892 2490 - B24
31 Gui, Runlin 2761 2436 - B22
32 Shen, Max 2704 2415 - B24
33 Wilkens, Zach 3010 2400 29 B25
34 Libson, Tazman 2793 2386 2 B25
35 Zone, Liam 2816 2385 - B23
36 Zhou, Alec 2697 2374 - B24
37 Alvior, Jacob 2715 2366 16 B25
38 Topaz, Nicholas 2730 2315 49 C23
39 Coughlin, Nolan 2742 2305 - C25
40 Bagha, Armin 2653 2273 - A24
41 Wyatt, Seth 2728 2267 319 A25
42 Norman, Christian 2607 2265 37 B24
43 Mittal, Sanil 2705 2250 - A24
44 Piccus, Isaac 2723 2247 - D23
45 Schapiro, Jacob 2608 2229 - B22
46 Lim, Timothy 2862 2221 - C24
47 Tong, Chihao 2802 2201 - D23
48 Shafaie, Kaveh 3071 2182 - E25
49 Singh, Arnav 2688 2093 106 D25
50 Li, Peizhen (Daniel) 2845 2081 244 C25
51 Hermes, Henry 2461 2052 - D24
52 Hamilton-Meikle, Jonathan 3373 2022 - U
53 Ling, Valdis 2847 2013 - B23

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.