| Rank | Name | Strength |
Conservative Estimate* Cons. Est.* |
180-day Trend |
Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lawson, Nicholas | 3977 | 3703 | - | A24 |
| 2 | Haddad, Justin | 3876 | 3611 | - | A22 |
| 3 | Merchant, Reza | 3516 | 3160 | - | B23 |
| 4 | Xu, Timothy (Tingwei) | 3552 | 3152 | - | A23 |
| 5 | Gaidar, Daniel | 3463 | 3110 | - | A22 |
| 6 | Spier, Julian | 3363 | 3080 | 38 | A26 |
| 7 | Marchant, Albert | 3343 | 3058 | - | B25 |
| 8 | Kumar, Anitya | 3271 | 2999 | - | A21 |
| 9 | Westphal, David | 3317 | 2984 | 83 | A26 |
| 10 | Meinhold, Li | 3234 | 2882 | 26 | A26 |
| 11 | Bodon, Michele | 3231 | 2862 | - | B24 |
| 12 | Kokenge, Clark | 3149 | 2855 | - | B23 |
| 13 | Zubeck, Dominic | 3141 | 2785 | 4 | A24 |
| 14 | Kenyon, Jacob | 3187 | 2780 | 15 | A23 |
| 15 | Menegoli, Lorenzo | 3114 | 2752 | 15 | A25 |
| 16 | Wang, Nathan | 3087 | 2745 | - | A18 |
| 17 | Peters, Nathan | 3071 | 2707 | 67 | A22 |
| 18 | Schultz, Alex | 3093 | 2682 | - | B25 |
| 19 | Diederichs, Jimmy | 3160 | 2631 | - | A21 |
| 20 | Sjostedt, Jacob | 3019 | 2595 | - | B23 |
| 21 | Dolmetsch, Max | 2859 | 2565 | 5 | B26 |
| 22 | Wilkens, Zach | 3008 | 2460 | 21 | B25 |
| 23 | Gui, Runlin | 2761 | 2436 | - | B22 |
| 24 | Zhou, Alec | 2750 | 2436 | 62 | B26 |
| 25 | Shen, Max | 2704 | 2415 | - | B24 |
| 26 | Libson, Tazman | 2730 | 2366 | 22 | B25 |
| 27 | Bagha, Armin | 2706 | 2352 | 79 | A24 |
| 28 | Alvior, Jacob | 2682 | 2343 | 65 | B25 |
| 29 | Coughlin, Nolan | 2742 | 2305 | - | C25 |
| 30 | Norman, Christian | 2607 | 2265 | - | B24 |
| 31 | Wyatt, Seth | 2714 | 2259 | 8 | A25 |
| 32 | Topaz, Nicholas | 2661 | 2253 | 111 | C23 |
| 33 | Lim, Timothy | 2862 | 2221 | - | C24 |
| 34 | Tong, Chihao | 2802 | 2201 | - | D23 |
| 35 | Shafaie, Kaveh | 3071 | 2182 | - | E25 |
| 36 | Schapiro, Jacob | 2528 | 2163 | 66 | B22 |
| 37 | Singh, Arnav | 2688 | 2093 | - | D25 |
| 38 | Li, Peizhen (Daniel) | 2765 | 2078 | 249 | C26 |
| 39 | Woodall, Ian | 2364 | 2046 | 152 | C25 |
| 40 | Anderson, Riley | 2283 | 2004 | 1 | C25 |
* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.