Strength Ranking

Men's Epee, Birth Year 2002

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate*
Cons. Est.*
180-day
Trend
Rating
1 Haddad, Justin 3391 3134 34 A22
2 Lawson, Nicholas 3384 3125 - A24
3 Xu, Timothy (Tingwei) 3240 2965 - A23
4 Shifron, Daniel 3202 2906 - A20
5 Merchant, Reza 3113 2847 - B23
6 Bodon, Michele 3035 2771 - B24
7 Hamilton-Meikle, Jonathan 3211 2751 580 U
8 Walsh, Kevin 2883 2626 - A21
9 Steele, DeMario 2871 2593 70 B24
10 Brunet, Nathan 2864 2593 - B24
11 Wang, Nathan 2851 2592 - A18
12 Kang, Michael 2841 2591 - B24
13 Zubeck, Dominic 2872 2579 27 A24
14 Spier, Julian 2833 2570 54 A25
15 Kokenge, Clark 2813 2557 - B23
16 Kumar, Anitya 2799 2556 - A21
17 Marchant, Albert 2785 2534 - A21
18 Meinhold, Li 2765 2477 96 A24
19 Diederichs, Jimmy 2861 2477 - A21
20 Schultz, Alex 2742 2467 - A21
21 Westphal, David 2751 2462 - A24
22 Kreysch, Hendrik 3648 2461 - B24
23 Menegoli, Lorenzo 2742 2422 90 A25
24 Tarbuskovich III, John 2659 2398 - C21
25 Peters, Nathan 2698 2363 87 A22
26 Kenyon, Jacob 2710 2348 39 A23
27 Dolmetsch, Max 2609 2347 37 B21
28 Libson, Tazman 2619 2347 10 B25
29 Walker, Weymouth 2573 2319 - A20
30 Norman, Christian 2578 2309 40 B24
31 Shen, Max 2551 2299 - B24
32 Garcia-Rogers, Kyle 2591 2284 38 B21
33 Coughlin, Nolan 2596 2282 21 C25
34 Markas, Justin 2719 2253 - E21
35 Wilkens, Zach 2688 2242 56 B22
36 Zhou, Alec 2507 2239 11 B24
37 Alvior, Jacob 2498 2227 23 B22
38 Zone, Liam 2516 2225 - B23
39 Seini, Leandro 2730 2224 - A19
40 Juscinski, Michal 2480 2204 67 B24
41 Lim, Timothy 2470 2189 - C24
42 Park, Prestan 2578 2188 94 D23
43 Jordan, Jonathan 2527 2183 - D23
44 Hortelano, Ethan 2498 2180 - D24
45 Topaz, Nicholas 2435 2169 - C23
46 Corrales, Nikolas 2482 2164 - D23
47 Bagha, Armin 2425 2155 48 A24
48 Gui, Runlin 2400 2152 - B22
49 Wyatt, Seth 2442 2139 33 A25
50 Ma, Victor 2370 2125 22 A23
51 Piccus, Isaac 2397 2109 - D23
52 Mittal, Sanil 2389 2068 49 A24
53 Greger, Jack 2381 2037 - B23
54 Cronin, Darragh 2352 2030 35 C24
55 Rutherfurd, John (Trace) 2562 2023 - D24

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.