Strength Ranking

Women's Epee, Birth Year 2004

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate*
Cons. Est.*
180-day
Trend
Rating
1 Oxenreider, Tierna 3427 3145 27 A24
2 Joyce, Michaela 3386 3106 6 A24
3 Ketkar, Ketki 3393 3105 33 A24
4 Park, Faith 3352 3076 - A23
5 Watrall, Christina 3190 2925 - A24
6 Gandhi, Sedna 3095 2836 22 A23
7 O'Donnell, Amanda 3089 2831 47 A23
8 Tyler, Syd 3072 2806 24 A22
9 Wang, Karen 3053 2787 45 A24
10 Millette, Marie Frederique 3060 2786 12 A23
11 Chen, Zhengnan(Janet) 3007 2745 38 B23
12 Balakrishnan, Monica 2987 2735 - B22
13 Zhu, Chenxi (Heidi) 3024 2734 - C19
14 Zuhars, Renee 2987 2728 45 A23
15 Nguyen, Kaylin 2974 2719 15 B23
16 Wu, Fan 2958 2703 - A23
17 Maldonado, Pilar 2949 2694 - B23
18 Lu, Junyao 2853 2598 9 A23
19 Milewski, Nicole 2851 2592 7 A23
20 Wu, Amelia 2823 2565 - A23
21 Xu, Grace (XinYi) 2813 2548 - B20
22 Gaberkorn, Nadia 2808 2542 - B24
23 Wang, Elizabeth 2760 2508 36 A22
24 Damratoski, Anna 2757 2504 14 A23
25 Wang, Anne 2755 2499 - C23
26 Ketkar, Mallika 2748 2496 15 A24
27 Feland, Alexandra 2716 2467 - A22
28 Weber, Nora 2709 2463 - B22
29 Leang, Priscilla 2691 2439 - A22
30 Douglas, Julia 2679 2427 27 A21
31 Chan, Elizabeth 2644 2397 - C23
32 Kim, Elizabeth 2593 2341 45 B21
33 Xue, Alanna 2714 2333 51 A24
34 Witte, Vera 2579 2329 24 B23
35 Daranouvong, Logan 2554 2304 - B21
36 Edwards, Auprell 2533 2282 51 A23
37 Githens, Gracyn 2527 2271 - B23
38 Smuk, Daria 2504 2254 51 A24
39 Balogh, Bella 2995 2221 - D23
40 Zhou, Wenjun 2534 2191 36 C24
41 Gao, Judy 2439 2188 16 C24
42 Walbert, Charlotte 2572 2143 - U
43 Meschia, Maggie 2391 2141 - C20
44 Fazzini, Angelina 2408 2130 7 D22
45 Pan, Michelle 2365 2115 - C21
46 Zhu, Maggie 2644 2103 5 B23
47 Anderson, Nora 2359 2081 65 U
48 Fabbro, Izabela 2609 2074 178 B24
49 Abramson, Mariela 2317 2066 - C22
50 Pearson, Heila 2322 2066 22 C22
51 Du, Shunyi(Wendy) 2291 2038 - B22
52 Rainey, Zoe-Andrea 2293 2034 - D23
53 Saal, Anna 2275 2021 49 C22
54 Richardson, Lauren 2347 2014 - C22

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.