| Rank | Name | Strength |
Conservative Estimate* Cons. Est.* |
180-day Trend |
Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ding, Jiahe (Heidi) | 3138 | 2848 | 56 | A24 |
| 2 | Zafft, Tatiana | 3108 | 2847 | - | A21 |
| 3 | Lee, Sumin | 3117 | 2837 | 31 | A25 |
| 4 | Lee, Michelle | 3092 | 2833 | 36 | A22 |
| 5 | Chin, Isabella | 3075 | 2800 | 15 | A25 |
| 6 | Hu, Grace | 3030 | 2769 | 47 | A24 |
| 7 | Kuznetsov, Victoria | 2935 | 2679 | - | A24 |
| 8 | Chen, Lefu | 2900 | 2638 | 9 | A24 |
| 9 | Mao, Amy | 2867 | 2615 | - | A23 |
| 10 | Reid, Sobia | 2827 | 2576 | - | C23 |
| 11 | Smith, Grace | 2763 | 2507 | - | B22 |
| 12 | Semikin, Julia | 2746 | 2492 | - | B22 |
| 13 | Temiryaev, Anna | 2727 | 2475 | 13 | B23 |
| 14 | Papadakis, Lily | 2724 | 2469 | - | A23 |
| 15 | Ning, Emma | 2719 | 2463 | 60 | A22 |
| 16 | Kale, Anika | 2698 | 2447 | - | B23 |
| 17 | McCutchen, Lauren (Lulu) | 2696 | 2446 | - | A22 |
| 18 | Gebala, Natalie Brooke | 2700 | 2444 | 16 | A25 |
| 19 | Gumagay, Erika | 2686 | 2434 | - | A22 |
| 20 | Liu, Christina | 2679 | 2420 | - | A23 |
| 21 | Wade-Currie, Ava | 2652 | 2397 | 129 | A24 |
| 22 | Tolba, Salma | 2637 | 2377 | - | D25 |
| 23 | Capellua, Mariasole | 2589 | 2334 | 6 | A23 |
| 24 | Joyal, Anne-Sophie | 2592 | 2334 | 3 | B25 |
| 25 | Kim, Rachael | 2678 | 2322 | - | E24 |
| 26 | Castaneda, Erika | 2644 | 2308 | - | D23 |
| 27 | Burn, Lauren | 2554 | 2299 | - | D22 |
| 28 | Minor, Lindsey | 2508 | 2252 | 26 | D25 |
| 29 | Nguyen, Audrey | 2406 | 2145 | 35 | A24 |
| 30 | Guerrero, Victoria | 2521 | 2142 | - | A24 |
| 31 | Li, Alisha | 2386 | 2138 | - | C22 |
| 32 | Popa, Catherine | 2375 | 2095 | - | D23 |
| 33 | Ren, Xingyun | 2930 | 2095 | - | D24 |
| 34 | Kent, Elizabeth | 2328 | 2074 | - | B22 |
| 35 | Taylor-Casamayor, Maia | 2322 | 2068 | - | C24 |
| 36 | Hicks, Grace | 2310 | 2059 | 6 | B23 |
| 37 | Lonadier, Keira | 2301 | 2053 | 107 | B25 |
| 38 | Tan, Jocelyn | 2286 | 2035 | 28 | C22 |
| 39 | Gregston, Lailia | 2350 | 2013 | - | E22 |
* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.