Rank | Name | Strength |
Conservative Estimate* Cons. Est.* |
180-day Trend |
Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ding, Jiahe (Heidi) | 3203 | 2904 | 23 | A24 |
2 | Lee, Michelle | 3129 | 2869 | 12 | A22 |
3 | Zafft, Tatiana | 3108 | 2847 | - | A21 |
4 | Hu, Grace | 3080 | 2816 | 30 | A24 |
5 | Lee, Sumin | 3083 | 2806 | 7 | A25 |
6 | Chin, Isabella | 3057 | 2782 | 85 | A24 |
7 | Kuznetsov, Victoria | 2935 | 2679 | 34 | A24 |
8 | Mao, Amy | 2867 | 2615 | - | A23 |
9 | Chen, Lefu | 2872 | 2604 | 19 | A24 |
10 | Wade-Currie, Ava | 2862 | 2599 | 54 | A24 |
11 | Reid, Sobia | 2827 | 2576 | - | C23 |
12 | Ning, Emma | 2780 | 2523 | 153 | A22 |
13 | Smith, Grace | 2763 | 2507 | 8 | B22 |
14 | Semikin, Julia | 2746 | 2492 | - | B22 |
15 | Temiryaev, Anna | 2739 | 2488 | 43 | B23 |
16 | Papadakis, Lily | 2724 | 2469 | 14 | A23 |
17 | Gebala, Natalie Brooke | 2719 | 2466 | 35 | A22 |
18 | Kale, Anika | 2698 | 2447 | - | B23 |
19 | McCutchen, Lauren (Lulu) | 2696 | 2446 | 38 | A22 |
20 | Gumagay, Erika | 2686 | 2434 | - | A22 |
21 | Liu, Christina | 2679 | 2420 | 4 | A23 |
22 | Tolba, Salma | 2637 | 2377 | - | C21 |
23 | Capellua, Mariasole | 2628 | 2370 | 99 | A23 |
24 | Joyal, Anne-Sophie | 2594 | 2337 | 37 | B24 |
25 | Kim, Rachael | 2678 | 2322 | - | E24 |
26 | Castaneda, Erika | 2644 | 2308 | - | D23 |
27 | Burn, Lauren | 2554 | 2299 | 90 | D22 |
28 | Minor, Lindsey | 2518 | 2259 | 69 | C21 |
29 | Lonadier, Keira | 2411 | 2160 | 54 | B24 |
30 | Nguyen, Audrey | 2414 | 2155 | 35 | A24 |
31 | Guerrero, Victoria | 2521 | 2142 | - | A24 |
32 | Li, Alisha | 2386 | 2138 | - | C22 |
33 | Popa, Catherine | 2375 | 2095 | - | D23 |
34 | Ren, Xingyun | 2930 | 2095 | 326 | U |
35 | Kent, Elizabeth | 2328 | 2074 | 14 | B22 |
36 | Taylor-Casamayor, Maia | 2322 | 2068 | - | C24 |
37 | Hicks, Grace | 2316 | 2065 | 29 | B23 |
38 | Tan, Jocelyn | 2314 | 2063 | 6 | C22 |
39 | Neisingh, Isabelle | 2286 | 2027 | 59 | C25 |
40 | Gregston, Lailia | 2350 | 2013 | - | E22 |
41 | Schultz, Gillian | 2263 | 2001 | 73 | C25 |
* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.