Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | OURSLER Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 28% | |
2 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | |
3 | BAS Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 31% | |
3 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
5 | WELCH Kyle J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | |
6 | MURRAY Maximo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
7 | SCHENCK Koen M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% | 18% | |
8 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 42% | |
9 | SERVELLO Augusto | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% |
10 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
11 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | 13% | |
12 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% | |
13 | BAUMSTEIN Nicholas I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% | |
14 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 9% |
15 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 26% | |
16 | LIMA Kevin M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% | |
17 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | |
18 | DU Samuel R. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
19 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 20% | 2% |
20 | BUERGIN Aidan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | 16% | 2% | |
21 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | 8% | |
22 | DESANDO Michael R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 11% | |
23 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 29% | |
24 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% | |
25 | DOBBINS Evan W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
26 | KNIZHNIK David | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 17% | 1% | |
27 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
28 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | 9% | |
28 | HAN Lawrence | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
30 | LEE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 6% |
31 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
32 | AHN Jun | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 6% | |
33 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% | 4% | |
34 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 19% | 2% | |
35 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 6% |
36 | DAUM Charlie | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
37 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | - |
38 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 100% | 90% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | |
39 | CHAN Tyler | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 10% | |
40 | LOCKWOOD Owen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 10% | |
41 | HOWARD Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
42 | FU Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 3% |
43 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 90% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
44 | LIGOS Alex M. | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
45 | ORVANANOS Jorge | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
46 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 89% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | |
46 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 88% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | |
48 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 7% | - | |
49 | LEWIS Akhil | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
50 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
51 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - |
51 | STRAYER Andrew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - |
53 | LAURICELLA Douglas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | 2% |
54 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 81% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
55 | VERSTEELE Sander | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
56 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
56 | TORRES Treston | 100% | 70% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
58 | YOON DYLAN | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
59 | REZA Farazi | 100% | 50% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
60 | LOU Andy | 100% | 76% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
61 | JAUME Andrei | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
62 | MIALL Steven A. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - | |
63 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 94% | 63% | 19% | 2% | - | |
64 | AMRANI David | 100% | 49% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
65 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 100% | 62% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
66 | LI Arvin | 100% | 92% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | |
67 | LE Vyn A. | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
68 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
69 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 62% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
70 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 83% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
71 | WANG Michael | 100% | 95% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - | |
72 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 90% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | |
73 | GALLER Dave | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
74 | MONTALBINE Aidan | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
75 | SATTAR Dylan | 100% | 28% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.