DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HRAPSKY Ryan J. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% |
2 | SHELANSKI Isaac | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 43% | 46% |
3 | NORTH Gary S. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 35% | 59% |
3 | RHYU Kozmo | - | - | - | 5% | 27% | 51% | 17% |
5 | PARK Ian C. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
6 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% |
7 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
8 | DAVIDZON Ekaterina | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
9 | WRIGHT Ezra B. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
10 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | - | - | - | 6% | 28% | 45% | 21% |
11 | WOZNIAK Ignacy | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
12 | O'HARA Keegan J. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 34% | 8% |
13 | DUAN Eric | - | 10% | 37% | 39% | 12% | 1% | - |
14 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 9% | |
15 | AYMETT Robert (Skip) S. | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 5% | - |
16 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - |
17 | HARDY Tristan L. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
18 | CAO Brad | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
19 | USDIN Anton | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
20 | ZHANG Caden | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
21 | ASHER Valerie | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
22 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
23 | KWOUN Miles S. | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
24 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 47% | 10% |
25 | WANG Tristan | - | 8% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - |
26 | CAO Albert | - | 6% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - |
27 | PALAMARCHUK Matthew | 1% | 28% | 47% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
28 | CHAMBLISS Logan C. | - | 11% | 39% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
29 | ILYAS Zakariya | 11% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
30 | ROTHKA Spencer J. | - | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
31 | BANNEN Nicholas | 20% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
32 | SIEDOW Jeffrey | 15% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
33 | BLACK Ethan | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
34 | BRUNDAGE Nevan | 24% | 50% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
35 | ANDREWS Iain | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 18% | 2% |
36 | MACE Eliza M. | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
37 | ARMSTRONG Gary | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
38 | FRENCH Phaelen | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
39 | PALAMARCHUK Andriy | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
40 | DOHERTY Eva | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
41 | KOMISAR-BURY Ryley | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.