DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HRAPSKY Ryan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% |
| 2 | SHELANSKI Isaac | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 46% |
| 3 | NORTH Gary S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% |
| 3 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 17% |
| 5 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
| 6 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% |
| 7 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
| 8 | DAVIDZON Ekaterina | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | WRIGHT Ezra B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% |
| 10 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 21% |
| 11 | WOZNIAK Ignacy | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 12 | O'HARA Keegan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | 8% |
| 13 | DUAN Eric | 100% | 100% | 89% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 14 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 9% | |
| 15 | AYMETT Robert (Skip) S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 5% | - |
| 16 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 17 | HARDY Tristan L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 10% |
| 18 | CAO Brad | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 19 | USDIN Anton | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | ZHANG Caden | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 21 | ASHER Valerie | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 22 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 23 | KWOUN Miles S. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 24 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 10% |
| 25 | WANG Tristan | 100% | 100% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 26 | CAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 27 | PALAMARCHUK Matthew | 100% | 99% | 71% | 25% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | CHAMBLISS Logan C. | 100% | 100% | 89% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 29 | ILYAS Zakariya | 100% | 89% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | ROTHKA Spencer J. | 100% | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | BANNEN Nicholas | 100% | 80% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | SIEDOW Jeffrey | 100% | 85% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | BLACK Ethan | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | BRUNDAGE Nevan | 100% | 76% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 35 | ANDREWS Iain | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 20% | 2% |
| 36 | MACE Eliza M. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | ARMSTRONG Gary | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | FRENCH Phaelen | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 39 | PALAMARCHUK Andriy | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | DOHERTY Eva | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | KOMISAR-BURY Ryley | 100% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.