Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LO Jake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% |
| 2 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% |
| 3 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% |
| 3 | FU Leon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 5 | ZHENG Haoran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 6 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 26% |
| 7 | DOWDELL Riley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 10% |
| 8 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
| 9 | WANG Devon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% |
| 10 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 7% |
| 11 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
| 12 | DRIBIN Ezra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% |
| 13 | MULCAHY Olaf | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 17% |
| 14 | QUITORIANO Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 15 | GINZBURG Adam | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 16 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 17 | LEE Inwoo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 18 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 19 | GAO Chaney C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 8% |
| 20 | CASTELLY Luke | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 11% |
| 21 | DAO Alexander | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 23 | CHOI Kaiden I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 24 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 30% | 5% |
| 25 | ZHU Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 26 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 27 | HIGGINS Calvin | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 28 | KIM Jayden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 29 | BARG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
| 30 | LOFTUS Luca | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 12% | 2% |
| 31 | TANDOC Noah | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | FERRIERE Joshua | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 60% | 27% | 5% |
| 33 | OBERDERFER Vladimir | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 34 | KIM Ian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 35 | WANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
| 36 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 37 | LIU Yikun | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 38 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 2% |
| 39 | JU Hanul | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | HOGE William P. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 41 | MIAO Kunqi | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 42 | MEHROTRA Neel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 43 | CHEN Zhengyang | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
| 43 | DONAHUE Lake | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 45 | KAO Yishane | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 22% |
| 46 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 47 | XIONG Aaron | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 48 | HERNDON Liam | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 49 | MENDOZA Zander | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
| 50 | YU Austin | 100% | 92% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 51 | CHEN Josh | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | SU Oliver | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 53 | SEO Shawn | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 54 | KIM Teddy | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 55 | MORALES Esteban | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 56 | RAHMAN Yousef | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | HALL Gabriel | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 58 | DE LA TORRE PEREZ Jesus Adiel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 59 | CHANG Andrew | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 60 | MAJAM Brandon Audie | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 61 | LIANG Eric | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | TUSANTOSO McKenzie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 63 | LAU Christian | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 64 | ARMITAGE Liam | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | MARTIN Charles | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 66 | NUGENT Jack | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 67 | DENISON Declan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 68 | OLSON christopher | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 2% |
| 69 | TAI Edison | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 70 | MAXU Tiger | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 71 | NG Biwon | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 72 | LI zerong | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 73 | LEE JiYuen | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | WANG Joey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 75 | HINTON Evan | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 76 | ANDERSON Kai | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 77 | LEE Damien | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 78 | JAIN Samyak | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 79 | GOROZA Eric | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 80 | LIU Yueri | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 80 | SIM Ian | 100% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | KIM Justin | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 83 | PERKINS Jaray | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 84 | ABELAR Jacob | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 85 | GUO Woody | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 86 | RAHMAN Zayd | 100% | 56% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 87 | KIM Remington | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 88 | BAXTER Max | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 89 | RODRIGUEZ Ripley | 100% | 93% | 61% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 90 | CHANG Benjamin | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 91 | LEE Aidan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.