Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KAO Castor T. | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 44% | 40% |
| 2 | LI Richard | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 3 | JIANG Owen | - | 4% | 22% | 43% | 27% | 5% | |
| 3 | SERVELLO Augusto | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% | |
| 5 | LIN Richard W. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% | |
| 6 | BAE Kevin | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 35% | 8% |
| 7 | LIU Niles J. | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% | |
| 8 | LEE Jacob J | - | 6% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 2% | |
| 9 | OURSLER Jack | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% |
| 10 | WU Alexander | - | - | - | 7% | 36% | 56% | |
| 11 | GONG Benjamin | - | 5% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | |
| 12 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% | |
| 13 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 46% | 9% | |
| 14 | WOO Christian | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 6% |
| 15 | SIEGEL Elliot | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 42% | 15% | |
| 16 | CHENG Nathan | - | 2% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 18 | DOBBINS Evan W. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 42% | 18% | |
| 19 | KLOSTERMANN Max | - | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
| 20 | WELCH Kyle J. | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% | |
| 21 | DU Samuel R. | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 3% | |
| 22 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 10% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | SHA Yi Peng | - | 2% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 8% | |
| 24 | HOWARD Michael | - | - | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 25 | ADLER David R. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 41% | 14% |
| 26 | SICHITIU Alexander | - | - | 9% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 2% |
| 27 | PYO Michael M. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% |
| 28 | FU Samuel Y. | - | - | 6% | 28% | 50% | 16% | |
| 29 | DAI Jonathan T. | - | - | 6% | 27% | 44% | 23% | |
| 30 | LIN James G. | 1% | 15% | 43% | 33% | 7% | - | |
| 31 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 3% | |
| 32 | LEE Jonah | 2% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 7% | - | |
| 33 | AHN Jun | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% | |
| 34 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | - | - | 8% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 35 | LI Eric | - | 1% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 12% | |
| 36 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 37 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 31% | 4% | |
| 37 | LI Arvin | 1% | 14% | 39% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 39 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 6% | 36% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | MCLEAN Miles K. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 41 | ZHAO Jesse | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 42 | WUJASTYK Leon | 7% | 54% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 43 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 2% | 16% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 44 | TSAI Max W. | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | GOOR Julian | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% | |
| 46 | MENG Zhaoyi | 15% | 49% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
| 46 | WU Michael | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 48 | WANG Michael | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 49 | BING Charles | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% | |
| 50 | XU Ethan | 31% | 53% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 51 | HODESS Ethan | - | - | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 52 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 53 | WECHSLER Jacob | - | 6% | 36% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 54 | PO Oliver | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 55 | HUANG Jonathan | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 56 | SHIN Joshua J. | - | 6% | 34% | 40% | 17% | 2% | |
| 57 | ZHEN Ethan | 7% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 58 | LI Ayren | 23% | 49% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 59 | LUH Ethan K. | - | 6% | 31% | 43% | 17% | 2% | |
| 60 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 22% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 61 | TALLARICO Matthew | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 62 | ALIMI Yacine A. | - | 10% | 38% | 39% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 63 | VO Jonathan | 42% | 57% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 64 | LANG Dong Lin | 5% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 65 | SHAO Eric | 47% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 66 | SULLIVAN Matthew | 34% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 67 | KONG Luculentus X. | 24% | 65% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 68 | LI Matthew | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 69 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 58% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 70 | GUO Hairuo | 48% | 44% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 71 | EXNICIOS Richard M. | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 71 | WOHLERS Trevor | 44% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 71 | JIN Dennis H. | 57% | 36% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 74 | MURDOCH Walter | 68% | 30% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 75 | SATTAR Dylan | 78% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 76 | EXNICIOS Rex | 56% | 43% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.