Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% |
| 2 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
| 3 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 32% | 5% | |
| 3 | SERVELLO Augusto | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | |
| 5 | LIN Richard W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | |
| 6 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | 8% |
| 7 | LIU Niles J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | |
| 8 | LEE Jacob J | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 25% | 2% | |
| 9 | OURSLER Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% |
| 10 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 56% | |
| 11 | GONG Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 3% | |
| 12 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 15% | |
| 13 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 9% | |
| 14 | WOO Christian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 6% |
| 15 | SIEGEL Elliot | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 15% | |
| 16 | CHENG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 18 | DOBBINS Evan W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 18% | |
| 19 | KLOSTERMANN Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
| 20 | WELCH Kyle J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | |
| 21 | DU Samuel R. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 27% | 3% | |
| 22 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 90% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 8% | |
| 24 | HOWARD Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 25 | ADLER David R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 14% |
| 26 | SICHITIU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 59% | 20% | 2% |
| 27 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 7% |
| 28 | FU Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 16% | |
| 29 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 23% | |
| 30 | LIN James G. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 40% | 8% | - | |
| 31 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 26% | 3% | |
| 32 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 7% | - | |
| 33 | AHN Jun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 30% | |
| 34 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
| 35 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 47% | 12% | |
| 36 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 37 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | 4% | |
| 37 | LI Arvin | 100% | 99% | 85% | 45% | 10% | 1% | |
| 39 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 100% | 94% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | MCLEAN Miles K. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 41 | ZHAO Jesse | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 42 | WUJASTYK Leon | 100% | 93% | 38% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 43 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
| 44 | TSAI Max W. | 100% | 91% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 17% | |
| 46 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 85% | 36% | 6% | - | - | |
| 46 | WU Michael | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 48 | WANG Michael | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 49 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% | |
| 50 | XU Ethan | 100% | 69% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 51 | HODESS Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 52 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 53 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 100% | 94% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 54 | PO Oliver | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 55 | HUANG Jonathan | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 56 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% | 20% | 2% | |
| 57 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 93% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 58 | LI Ayren | 100% | 77% | 28% | 4% | - | - | |
| 59 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 19% | 2% | |
| 60 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 78% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 61 | TALLARICO Matthew | 100% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 62 | ALIMI Yacine A. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 63 | VO Jonathan | 100% | 58% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 64 | LANG Dong Lin | 100% | 95% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 65 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 66 | SULLIVAN Matthew | 100% | 66% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 67 | KONG Luculentus X. | 100% | 76% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 68 | LI Matthew | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
| 69 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 42% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 70 | GUO Hairuo | 100% | 52% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 71 | EXNICIOS Richard M. | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 71 | WOHLERS Trevor | 100% | 56% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 71 | JIN Dennis H. | 100% | 43% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 74 | MURDOCH Walter | 100% | 32% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 75 | SATTAR Dylan | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 76 | EXNICIOS Rex | 100% | 44% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.