Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | PRASAD Ankith | V V V D V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 2 | GOHEL Dayus T. | V V V V D D | V V V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 3 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | V D V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 3 | WRIGHT Christopher | V V D D V | V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 5 | KULIKOWSKI Adam J. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 6 | LIU Yichen | V V V D V V | V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 7 | AGAON Shawn | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 8 | MCKEEVER Luca | V V V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 9 | LEONE III Charles D. | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 10 | AGAON Ethan | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 11 | KOKENGE Reid | V V D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 12 | VEZMAR Evan H. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 13 | DENNIS Ethan | V D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 14 | LEE Seungwon | V V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 15 | NIKOLOV Peter | V V V D V D | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 16 | SONG Alexander | D D V V V | V V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 17 | PRABHAKAR vibhav | V V D V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 18 | KHANNA Nikhil | V V V V D | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 19 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | V V D V D V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 20 | NGUYEN Tate | V V D V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 21 | MILLER Lance W. | D V V D V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 22 | DAO Alexander | V V V D D | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 23 | BROWN Hunter | V D D V D V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 24 | WEI Michael | V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 25 | WOLFE Alex | D V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 26 | YAO Geoffrey B. | D D V D V | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 27 | LOISEAU Eliott | D D D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 28 | O'DONNELL Benjamin | D D D V D | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 29 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | D D D D V | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 30 | AGARWAL Adheesh | D D V D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 31 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | D D D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 32 | BUTLER Miles | D D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 33 | SONN Rohan | D V V D V D | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 34 | SHA Michael | D D V V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 35 | SCHWAN Ethan | V D D V D | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
| 36 | KOZAKIEWICZ Filip | D D V D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 37 | COUSINS Cameron | V D V D D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 38 | ROBERTS Magnus | D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 39 | DIVERIS Joseph | D V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 40 | CHIN Dylan A. | D D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 41 | LAZARRE Alex | V D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 42 | COPEN Samuel S. | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 43 | SILVERS Ari | D D D D D | D | 3.3 | 0 | -3.3 |
| 44 | LOWENSTEIN Isaac | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 45 | PEMPEK Quintin L. | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.