Fredericksburg Expo & Conference Center - Hall A & B - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JEYOON Ryan S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
2 | CLICK Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
3 | KIM Dylan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 50% |
3 | CAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
5 | SINGH Aryaman | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 3% |
6 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
7 | LIN Harrison | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
8 | JORDAN Anton | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 4% |
9 | CHAMBLISS Logan C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 15% |
10 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
11 | CAO Brad | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 49% | 11% | |
12 | STEPHENS Corbin | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
13 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 3% |
14 | SINGH Ravin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
15 | KWOUN Miles S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% |
16 | LEE Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 24% | |
17 | NORTH Alexander M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% |
18 | MURPHY Thomas P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 19% |
19 | WANG Trontour | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
20 | ALLEY Everett T | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
21 | LAM Alan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
22 | ABBOUD Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
23 | GLENNON Sebastian J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
24 | ZHANG Caden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
25 | TIKHONOV Iliya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
26 | TIKHONOV Daniel | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
27 | GANTSOUDES Isaac | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - | |
28 | ALI Farhan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
29 | HEADRICK Lance | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 30% | 4% |
30 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
31 | WANG Clayton | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% | |
32 | PAL Ian K. | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
33 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | 100% | 99% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
34 | MAHESH Tarun | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
35 | PETROW Zoryan | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | |
36 | FISHMAN Rahm | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
37 | KIM Minhyeok | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | - |
38 | SAUNIER Cameron | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
39 | ZHANG Andy | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
40 | KE Sebastian | 100% | 85% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
41 | TIRADO Giancarlo | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
42 | BERNARD Jack B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
43 | CAVE Rylan | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
44 | CHENH Justin | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
45 | DAN Rex | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
45 | KANG EUNWOO | 100% | 96% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
47 | VADDE Pranav | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
48 | MEGGERS Davin | 100% | 84% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
49 | MODANLOU Navid | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
50 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 96% | 69% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
51 | WATERS Nathaniel | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
52 | THOMAS Gavin | 100% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
53 | CHADDA Ilyas | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | |
54 | SABHARWAL Harman | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
55 | HULL Liam | 100% | 56% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
55 | BLACK Ethan | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
55 | KIM Taeho | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
58 | KUPPUSAMY Kotravel | 100% | 91% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
59 | KOCOROWSKI Matthew | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
60 | CASSIDY Leo | 100% | 93% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.