Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | KIM Nicholas W. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
2 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | V V V D V V | V V V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
3 | RUSADZE Nickolas | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
3 | YU Vinni | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
5 | KAO Castor T. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
6 | SINGH Dayaal | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
7 | LI Richard | V V D V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
8 | LI Eric | V D D V V D | V V V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
9 | GONG Benjamin | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
10 | SIMA Congyu Josh | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
11 | BAE Kevin | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
12 | WU Alexander | V V V V D D | V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
13 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | V D V V V D | V V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
14 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | V V V D D V | V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
15 | AHN Jun | V D V D V | V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
16 | LEE Chris | D V D D V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
17 | KIM Yonjae | V V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
18 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
19 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
20 | DAI Jonathan T. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
21 | LANG Dong Lin | D V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
22 | LIN James G. | V V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
23 | BELLUOMO David C. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
24 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
25 | KATAYAMA Kevin | D V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
26 | SHA Yi Peng | V D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
27 | GRASS Andrew E. | D D V V V V | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
28 | SCHLESINGER Nathan | V D V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
29 | DU Samuel R. | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
30 | BARTEL Jacob L. | V V D D D V | V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
31 | PO Oliver | D V D V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
32 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | V D V D D | V V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
33 | LEWIS Akhil | V V V V V | D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
34 | MOHAMED Murad | D V V V V V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
35 | PYO Michael M. | V V V V D V | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
36 | WANG Mason | V D V V V V | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
37 | WONG Yuheng Isaac | D V V V V V | D | 0.9 | 5 | +4.1 |
38 | LIN Michael | V V V D V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
39 | KLOTZ Isaiah | D V V D V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
40 | LEE Jonah | V V D D V V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
41 | MATSAKH Philip | V D V V D V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
42 | DAUM Charlie | D V V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
43 | WUJASTYK Leon | V D V V V D | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
44 | ACHILOV Sayid | V D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
45 | YAO Bradley | D V D V V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
46 | POPE Alexander | D V V D V | V D | 0.7 | 3 | +2.3 |
47 | JIANG Owen | V V D D D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
48 | CHENG Jonathan | V V V D D D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
49 | DOBBINS Evan W. | V V D D V D | V D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
49 | LI Arvin | D D D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
51 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | D D V V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
52 | KNIZHNIK David | D V D V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
53 | MILLER Aidan A. | V D D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
54 | MONTALVO-ZOTTER Gabriel M. | V D D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
55 | TEMPLE Jackson | V D V D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
56 | LEE Jacob | V D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
57 | NAGER Noah | D V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
58 | LIGOS Alex M. | D V V D D D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
59 | ZOBEL Eric H. | D D V V D D | V D | 4.5 | 2 | -2.5 |
60 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | V D V D D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
61 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | D D D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
62 | WECHSLER Jacob | D V D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
63 | SONG Bryan | D V D D D D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
64 | REZA Farazi | D D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
65 | YOON Dylan | D V V V D D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
66 | MOHAMED Amir | D D D V V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
67 | MENG Zhaoyi | D V V D V D | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
68 | HUANG Jonathan | V V D V D D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
69 | TAHOUN Mostafa | D V D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
70 | GUO Justin | V D D V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
71 | ORVANANOS Jorge | D D V D D V | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
72 | HE Xiangrui | V D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
73 | RITCHIE Luke W. | V D D D V D | D | 5.1 | 2 | -3.1 |
74 | DAVIDSON Elliot | V V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
75 | KEE Andrew L. | D V D D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
76 | WU Michael | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
77 | XU Ethan | D D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
78 | LI Aaron | D D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
79 | ROBINS Brennan | D V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
80 | SRINIVASAN Vedant | D D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
81 | AMRANI David | V D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
82 | PITERBARG Maxim | D D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
83 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | D D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
84 | WANG Michael | D D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
85 | LI Ayren | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
86 | PETERSON Dale | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
86 | LEVY Jacob | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
88 | LEUNG Jin | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
89 | BOISLARD Adam J. | D D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
89 | LI Toby | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
91 | CHANDRAMOHAN Aran | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
92 | HARRIS Noah | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
93 | HAYLON Caleb | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
94 | TRAUB William | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
95 | OLLARI John W. | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.