Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KIM Nicholas W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
2 | ONIK Elijah T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 13% |
3 | FU Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% |
3 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 18% |
5 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
6 | AZUELA Maximo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
7 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 36% | 9% |
8 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% |
9 | HUTH Mitchell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 24% |
10 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 17% | |
11 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% | |
12 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% |
13 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% |
14 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
15 | SINGH Dayaal | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 21% | |
16 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
17 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% |
18 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 7% |
19 | KIM Yonjae | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% | |
20 | NAGER Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% |
21 | KIM Tei D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 28% |
22 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 57% |
23 | DU Samuel R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% |
24 | AHN Jun | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 24% | 3% | |
25 | LEE Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 18% |
26 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
27 | GEOGHEGAN Ronan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
28 | TSAI Max W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 2% |
29 | LI Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 12% |
30 | PAN Eric | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
31 | ZHANG Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% |
32 | MARX Jackson L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 26% | 4% |
33 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 9% |
34 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
35 | SICHITIU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
36 | WANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
37 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 14% |
38 | LEE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
39 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 25% | 3% |
40 | ANTON Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 13% | 1% |
41 | WANG Alex L. | 100% | 98% | 73% | 28% | 4% | - | - |
42 | YU Jason | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 6% | - |
43 | CATINO Brennen | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - |
44 | ORVANANOS Jorge | 100% | 99% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
45 | MARX Oscar L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 29% | |
46 | PAE Jonathan L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 27% | |
47 | MCLEAN Miles K. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 3% | |
48 | PAE Brian L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 3% |
49 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
50 | GAO Anthony | 100% | 100% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - |
51 | MIALL Steven A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% |
52 | XIANG Derrick | 100% | 98% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
53 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 7% | - |
54 | GUO Sean | 100% | 98% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | |
55 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
56 | QI Steve | 100% | 87% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | |
57 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | 100% | 73% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
58 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
59 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
60 | LOU Darren | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
61 | ALIMI Yacine A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 31% | 4% | - |
62 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 5% |
63 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 4% | |
64 | LEE Jacob J | 100% | 91% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
65 | GU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 78% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
66 | XU Xinhao ( Sonny) | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
67 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
68 | GONG Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 8% |
69 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
70 | LI Matthew | 100% | 98% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
71 | SONG Austin | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
72 | LI Chenglang Ryan | 100% | 92% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
73 | TANG August L. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
73 | TORRES Treston | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
75 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
76 | SVERDLOV Seth | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
77 | MITRA Debarghya | 100% | 85% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - |
78 | LI Jinghua E. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
79 | ACHILOV Sayid | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
80 | XU Ethan | 100% | 93% | 63% | 22% | 3% | - | |
81 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
82 | WANG Mason | 100% | 82% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
83 | ZHANG Zixuan "Mark" | 100% | 60% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
84 | PROMRAT Pete | 100% | 98% | 68% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
85 | LIU Charles | 100% | 61% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
86 | HUA Aiden | 100% | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
87 | GUO Justin | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
88 | JIA Jing Yu | 100% | 40% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
89 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 71% | 28% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
90 | TANG Albert | 100% | 83% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
91 | LEWIS Nikhil I. | 100% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
92 | LIGOS Alex M. | 100% | 61% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
93 | LEWIS Akhil | 100% | 71% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
93 | BAUMANN Gunnar | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
95 | LI Yao (Liam) | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
96 | WANG Julang | 100% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | |
97 | HUANG Eythan | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
97 | XU Feng | 100% | 85% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
99 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
100 | LU Xiao | 100% | 70% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
101 | TING Clement | 100% | 33% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
102 | LOU Felix | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.