Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Nicholas W. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
| 2 | ONIK Elijah T. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% |
| 3 | FU Samuel Y. | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
| 3 | BAE Kevin | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 44% | 18% |
| 5 | CHENG Jonathan | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 45% |
| 6 | AZUELA Maximo | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 7 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 9% |
| 8 | BING Charles | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% |
| 9 | HUTH Mitchell | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 46% | 24% |
| 10 | KAO Castor T. | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 17% | |
| 11 | DAI Jonathan T. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 46% | 30% | |
| 12 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 53% |
| 13 | LI Richard | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
| 14 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 15 | SINGH Dayaal | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 21% | |
| 16 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 17 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% |
| 18 | KEE Andrew L. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 7% |
| 19 | KIM Yonjae | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 27% | |
| 20 | NAGER Noah | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 21 | KIM Tei D. | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 28% |
| 22 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 36% | 57% |
| 23 | DU Samuel R. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% |
| 24 | AHN Jun | - | 6% | 27% | 43% | 21% | 3% | |
| 25 | LEE Joshua | - | - | - | 4% | 25% | 53% | 18% |
| 26 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 27 | GEOGHEGAN Ronan | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 28 | TSAI Max W. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% | 2% |
| 29 | LI Owen | - | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 12% |
| 30 | PAN Eric | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | ZHANG Evan | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 3% |
| 32 | MARX Jackson L. | - | - | 7% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% |
| 33 | KWON Ethan | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 9% |
| 34 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 35 | SICHITIU Alexander | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 36 | WANG Jonathan | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 37 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 14% |
| 38 | LEE Aidan | - | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
| 39 | WU Alexander | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 3% |
| 40 | ANTON Nathaniel | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 41 | WANG Alex L. | 2% | 25% | 45% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | YU Jason | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 43 | CATINO Brennen | - | 6% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 44 | ORVANANOS Jorge | 1% | 15% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
| 45 | MARX Oscar L. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% | |
| 46 | PAE Jonathan L. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 47% | 27% | |
| 47 | MCLEAN Miles K. | 1% | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
| 48 | PAE Brian L. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 3% |
| 49 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 16% | 39% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | GAO Anthony | - | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 51 | MIALL Steven A. | - | - | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% |
| 52 | XIANG Derrick | 2% | 19% | 42% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 53 | ZHEN Ethan | - | 3% | 22% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 54 | GUO Sean | 2% | 33% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 55 | SHIN Joshua J. | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
| 56 | QI Steve | 13% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | 27% | 46% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 58 | CHEN Kyle P. | 1% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 59 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 60 | LOU Darren | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 61 | ALIMI Yacine A. | - | 3% | 21% | 45% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 62 | LI Eric | - | - | 5% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 5% |
| 63 | JIANG Owen | - | 6% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 4% | |
| 64 | LEE Jacob J | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 65 | GU Andrew | - | 1% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 66 | XU Xinhao ( Sonny) | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 67 | MENG Zhaoyi | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 68 | GONG Benjamin | - | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% |
| 69 | LIN James G. | - | 2% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 70 | LI Matthew | 2% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 71 | SONG Austin | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 72 | LI Chenglang Ryan | 8% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 73 | TANG August L. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 73 | TORRES Treston | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 75 | WECHSLER Jacob | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 76 | SVERDLOV Seth | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 77 | MITRA Debarghya | 15% | 44% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 78 | LI Jinghua E. | 1% | 13% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 79 | ACHILOV Sayid | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 80 | XU Ethan | 7% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 81 | LIN Michael | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 82 | WANG Mason | 18% | 47% | 29% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 83 | ZHANG Zixuan "Mark" | 40% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 84 | PROMRAT Pete | 2% | 31% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 85 | LIU Charles | 39% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 86 | HUA Aiden | 27% | 49% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 87 | GUO Justin | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 88 | JIA Jing Yu | 60% | 37% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 89 | SHAO Eric | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 90 | TANG Albert | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 91 | LEWIS Nikhil I. | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 92 | LIGOS Alex M. | 39% | 51% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 93 | LEWIS Akhil | 29% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 93 | BAUMANN Gunnar | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 95 | LI Yao (Liam) | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 96 | WANG Julang | 88% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 97 | HUANG Eythan | 36% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 97 | XU Feng | 15% | 43% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 99 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 46% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 100 | LU Xiao | 30% | 62% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
| 101 | TING Clement | 67% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 102 | LOU Felix | 22% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.