Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SOOMRO Adam A. | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
| 2 | DIXON Thomas | 2% | 15% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 3 | LANGTON Sawyer | - | - | 4% | 25% | 45% | 26% | |
| 3 | RICHARD Owen | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 28% |
| 5 | LONCAR Luka E. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 24% | |
| 6 | SHAH Maximilian A. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 7 | BORODITSKY Ethan | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 39% | |
| 8 | WU Joseph | 1% | 7% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 3% | |
| 9 | LIU Jack | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 10 | GOHEL Dayus T. | - | - | 5% | 36% | 44% | 15% | |
| 11 | POZOVSKIY Mitchell R. | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 10% | |
| 12 | MACARTY Jordan T. | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 70% | |
| 13 | HURDAL Leif G. | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 4% | |
| 14 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | - | 1% | 13% | 45% | 37% | 5% | |
| 15 | LEE Noah | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 70% | |
| 16 | BORATGIS Christopher J. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 45% | 22% |
| 17 | KOKENGE Reid | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
| 18 | BEYRICH Henry J. | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 18 | MISHIMA Torata | 1% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 1% | |
| 20 | CHESNEY Aiden R. | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 21 | BENATER Ethan | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 34% | |
| 22 | WU Marcus | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 23 | LIN Chenzhe | 27% | 50% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 24 | PARK Frederick | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 32% | 4% | |
| 25 | JIN Owen | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 1% | |
| 26 | LIEF Isaac R. | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 13% | |
| 27 | KOBI Samuel | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 22% | |
| 28 | DE CLERMONT Geo | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | |
| 29 | JANKOWICH Alexander E. | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | SCHADE Lucas | 20% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | KARAMANIAN Nicholas | 17% | 43% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | CHOW Maxwell | 27% | 45% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 33 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 20% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | LEE Hudson | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 35 | STEWART Charlie | 15% | 41% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | NESTERCZUK Maddox W. | 23% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
| 37 | ROYTBURD Samuel | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | KHALITOV Alexander | 8% | 46% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | WIECHMANN Colin | 2% | 16% | 42% | 32% | 8% | - | |
| 40 | WU Jonathan | 21% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | GILLIS George | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | WANG Max S | 48% | 44% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 43 | GONG Haixiang | 36% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.