The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 19% |
| 2 | LOGUE Ethan D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% |
| 3 | ZAYDMAN David M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 3 | ULINICH Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
| 5 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% | |
| 6 | SARKAR Anish | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 5% | |
| 7 | HUSSAIN Kamran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 8 | PARK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% |
| 9 | BARNETT Devin | 100% | 95% | 68% | 23% | |||
| 10 | WATT Darren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 11 | RAJ Shrey | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 16% | 2% |
| 12 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 94% | 65% | 21% | |||
| 13 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
| 14 | ZHANG Alec | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 17% | |
| 15 | CHU Allan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
| 16 | LOFTUS Luca | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 17 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
| 18 | ZHANG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 5% |
| 19 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 10% |
| 20 | LIU Felix | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 5% | |
| 21 | MING Nathan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | TIEN Jabin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | LEE Bryson | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 24 | YU Austin | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 25 | GU Aidan | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 26 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 27 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | BHARGAV Angad | 100% | 80% | 36% | 6% | |||
| 29 | HSU Alexander | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | GUPTA Karan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 39% | 13% | 2% |
| 31 | LI Ethan R. | 100% | 76% | 32% | 5% | |||
| 32 | TONG Samuel | 100% | 90% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | ZHUANG William | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 34 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 35 | KUO Rylan | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 36 | SEO Shawn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 1% |
| 37 | HE Zhiheng | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 38 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | WONG Ethan | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | CLAES Lucas | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 41 | JAIN Samyak | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 42 | NG Biwon | 100% | 85% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | YUEN Nathan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 44 | BURLING Trenor | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 45 | DOWDELL Riley | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 2% | |
| 46 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | 100% | 83% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | LEVENTAL Mark | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 48 | BAKKEN Archer | 100% | 64% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 49 | SIM Ian | 100% | 79% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | LAU Christian | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.