Boston , MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MACARTY Jordan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 2 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% | 2% | |
| 3 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 3 | KUMAR Aidan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 5 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 6 | LANGTON Sawyer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 20% |
| 7 | WEI Michael | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 8 | RUBIN Jake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
| 9 | DESTEFANO Julius | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 4% |
| 10 | KATS Dylan G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | |
| 11 | KUBATIN Anton V. | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 12 | ROLLO Emmett H. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 13 | PARK Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
| 14 | ZHANG Braydon | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 15 | MUSIENKO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 7% | |
| 16 | PRIHODKO Max | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 17 | IARIKOV Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 18 | SKORUPAN Grant | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 8% |
| 19 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 20 | BRODSKY Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 11% |
| 21 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 17% |
| 22 | WALCH Logan | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 23 | ZHANG William | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
| 24 | CHOI Mason | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | HUANG Adrian | 100% | 79% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | JIANG Matthew | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 27 | LI Zachary | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 28 | GONG Haixiang | 100% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 29 | JOSLIN Tyler | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 30 | WANG zhixing (Daniel） | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 31 | JIANG Bryan | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 32 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | PAN Tristan | 100% | 91% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | GUO ZIXU | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | LIN Zizhen | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | FANG Hanning | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 37 | DOWD Peter L. | 100% | 96% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | ZHAI Avalo | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 39 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 40 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | STEPHENSON Jacob | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.