San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
| 2 | DRIBIN Ezra | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% | ||
| 3 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 59% | |
| 3 | WANG DEVON | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
| 5 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 6 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 26% | |
| 7 | LEE Seungwon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | |
| 8 | MULCAHY Olaf | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 22% | |
| 9 | CASTELLY Luke | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 7% | ||
| 10 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
| 11 | CASASSOVICI Georges | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 9% | |
| 12 | REIERSON Risor | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 3% | |
| 13 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 8% | |
| 14 | CHIN Dylan A. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
| 15 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 3% | |
| 16 | DAO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
| 17 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 29% | |
| 18 | WANG owen | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | ||
| 19 | YU Austin | 100% | 91% | 58% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 20 | CHEN Tyler | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 21 | ZWICKER Jacob | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 22 | LEVENTAL Mark | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 23 | TONG Samuel | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 3% | ||
| 24 | KIM Jayden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 24 | CHEN Zhengyang | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 26 | BHATT Arjun | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 27 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | DOWDELL Riley | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 29 | CHEN Bailey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 19% | |
| 30 | COPEN Elliot P. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
| 31 | BUERGISSER Kai | 100% | 65% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 32 | WU Eric | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 9% | ||
| 33 | VINODH Matsya | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | ANDERSON Kai | 100% | 91% | 59% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 4% | - | |
| 36 | WANG William | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 37 | CHOI Zachary | 100% | 85% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | LI Ethan R. | 100% | 72% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 39 | BUERGISSER Tae | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | WANG Robert | 100% | 47% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | NOFZIGER Bennett | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 42 | ZHAO Colin | 100% | 91% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.