SportsPlex At Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
| 2 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% |
| 3 | CHAI Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 27% |
| 3 | RICHARD Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | |
| 5 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 6 | KUMAR Aidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 16% | |
| 7 | ATKINS Levi H. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 8 | SHCHUR Landon | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 8% | |
| 9 | MORSE Tyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | 17% |
| 9 | BHATNAGAR Ayan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% |
| 11 | PRIHODKO Max | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% | |
| 12 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% |
| 13 | MISHIMA Torata | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
| 14 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
| 15 | ZHANG ethan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 3% | - |
| 17 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 39% |
| 18 | AGAON Shawn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 19 | LAI Aedin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 20 | CAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 51% | 12% |
| 21 | CAO Brad | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 22 | OSTIGUY Cameron | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | CHOI Mason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 18% |
| 24 | YU Hunter | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 4% | |
| 25 | UPSHAW Micah | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
| 26 | BANKULLA Nihal R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 27 | SUN Jeffery | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 28 | REPIC Oliver | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 29 | GALLANT Antoine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% |
| 30 | SERAFIN Ben | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | |
| 31 | BASOK Nikita | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 9% | |
| 32 | KIM Juni C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 40% |
| 33 | TUMIBAY Noah C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% | |
| 34 | LAI Boden | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 35 | SUN Jason | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
| 36 | LI Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 14% |
| 37 | DODIN David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% |
| 38 | ZHAO Luhan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | |
| 39 | AGAON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 24% | |
| 40 | KOBI Samuel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% | |
| 41 | SHA Michael | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 6% | |
| 42 | PAN Tristan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
| 43 | WANG zhixing (Daniel） | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 38% | 7% |
| 44 | WANG justin | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 45 | SCAPICCHIO Stephen | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 46 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% | 1% |
| 47 | GILLER Augustus | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | KIM Tei D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% | |
| 48 | SVERDLOV Seth | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
| 50 | ROLLO Emmett H. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
| 51 | ARAVIND Athreya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
| 52 | KUBATIN Anton V. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 53 | FENG Du | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 53 | KOYFMAN Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 3% | - |
| 55 | REDDY Arya | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 56 | WU Colin | 100% | 93% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 57 | SAVORETTI Francesco | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
| 58 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 57% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 59 | MEN Junda | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 59 | LAPP Oliver | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 61 | JONELEIT Aidan | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | HU Anton | 100% | 88% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 63 | SHULKIN Mark | 100% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 64 | KUGLER Luke | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 65 | LEIBOWITZ Ryan | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 66 | KRISHNAN Skanda | 100% | 95% | 68% | 23% | 2% | - | - |
| 67 | ZHAO kuncheng | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 68 | GANESAN Mathavan | 100% | 89% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 69 | DORASZELSKI Mark | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 70 | SONG Troy | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 71 | GRAYSON Joshua | 100% | 97% | 66% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 72 | STELTENKAMP Neal | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 73 | LIU Jeremiah W. | 100% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 74 | KWON Aaron | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 75 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 5% | |
| 76 | SHIN Sangjune | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 77 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 10% |
| 78 | DUSSEAU Maddax | 100% | 87% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 79 | TANG Charles | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | STAFFORD Neti | 100% | 99% | 81% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 81 | NOHILLY Patrick | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 82 | HERTZOG Ben | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 83 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 84 | LIU Adam | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 85 | JACKSON Nicholas | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 86 | CHOU Benson | 100% | 84% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 87 | BENTAHA Averroes | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 88 | ZHANG Roland | 100% | 45% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 89 | MAHALINGAM Nikhil | 100% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 90 | TATE William Isom | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 90 | ANAFI Ari | 100% | 81% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 92 | JIANG Alex | 100% | 92% | 59% | 20% | 2% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.