Raleigh SJCC & Division II North American Cup

Cadet Men's Foil

Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 2:00 PM

Raleigh Convention Center - Raleigh, NC, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 DESERANNO Jeidus - - - - 4% 27% 69%
2 LI Eric - 1% 6% 25% 44% 24%
3 LEE Aidan - - - - 4% 29% 66%
3 LIN James G. - - - 5% 22% 45% 27%
5 CULLIVAN Justice - - - - 3% 24% 73%
6 HOOSHI Jayden C. - - - 1% 7% 33% 59%
7 RUSADZE Nickolas - - - 1% 7% 33% 59%
8 ELWOOD Sebastian F. - 1% 7% 25% 42% 24%
9 LEWIS Akhil - - - 2% 12% 40% 46%
10 TANG Owen S. - - - 5% 25% 44% 25%
11 DAI Jonathan T. - - - 1% 6% 31% 63%
12 COELHO Cristiano P. - - 1% 10% 38% 51%
13 WONG Garrick G. - - 1% 6% 23% 44% 27%
14 KIM Ryan Y. - - 2% 13% 39% 45%
15 SADOVSKY Leor B. - - - 1% 12% 41% 45%
16 AUGUSTINE Aaron A. - 1% 6% 22% 39% 28% 5%
17 SIU Aiden - - - - 3% 24% 72%
18 MARTIN IV Elmer D. - 2% 10% 30% 41% 18%
19 MIALL Steven A. - - 1% 5% 23% 45% 26%
20 JAIN Aditya - - - 2% 15% 41% 42%
21 LI Matthew - - 1% 6% 26% 43% 24%
21 ZHAI Jeffrey - - 1% 8% 25% 40% 25%
23 QIAN Jason H. - - 2% 13% 35% 37% 13%
24 PARK Jason B. - 6% 23% 39% 27% 5%
25 DESHMUKH Arjun - - 1% 5% 20% 42% 33%
26 LEE Jonah - - 6% 25% 41% 25% 3%
27 DINSAY Kristjan - - 3% 15% 37% 35% 9%
28 MATSAKH Philip - 2% 10% 27% 37% 21% 3%
29 WANG Winston - 4% 17% 33% 31% 13% 2%
30 RASMUSSEN Sage 2% 17% 37% 32% 11% 1%
31 RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen 19% 41% 30% 9% 1% -
32 ZHANG Aaron - 4% 16% 33% 33% 13% 1%
33 LIN Michael - - 1% 10% 32% 43% 14%
34 TIYA BIAYA K. - 1% 8% 28% 42% 21%
35 OH Jaden - 5% 20% 36% 28% 9% 1%
36 PO Oliver - - 1% 10% 33% 40% 16%
37 XU Xinhao ( Sonny) 1% 8% 30% 38% 20% 4% -
38 WYMAN Julian - 1% 6% 25% 43% 26%
39 ROSE Ben - 1% 10% 31% 40% 17%
40 STRINGER David - 5% 21% 36% 28% 9% 1%
41 REEVES Liam - - 3% 15% 37% 34% 10%
42 SONG Austin - 2% 17% 39% 32% 10% 1%
43 LING Eddie - 1% 7% 27% 41% 23% 2%
44 VADEN Oliver - 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1%
45 AKYAMAC Bora - 5% 22% 39% 26% 7% 1%
46 TANG Alexander L. - 2% 11% 30% 37% 19% 2%
47 WANG Brayden 1% 9% 32% 38% 18% 3% -
48 NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. - 1% 6% 24% 44% 25%
49 YAP Nathan 5% 21% 36% 28% 10% 1%
50 NGUYEN Martin 1% 8% 27% 39% 22% 4%
51 NICOLETTI Luca - - 3% 19% 41% 33% 4%
52 TSAO Lukas - 5% 19% 34% 29% 11% 1%
53 GONG Benjamin - - 1% 8% 28% 42% 20%
54 WONG Antonio - 3% 16% 34% 33% 12% 1%
55 SIMA Congyu Josh - - 3% 15% 36% 36% 10%
56 DERRICK Blake - 2% 15% 38% 32% 11% 1%
57 LEE Christopher T. - 2% 13% 31% 35% 17% 2%
57 PARRISH Evan - 6% 24% 38% 25% 6% 1%
59 KRYLTSOV Michael - 1% 5% 21% 37% 29% 7%
60 KLOTZ Isaiah - 2% 12% 32% 37% 15% 2%
61 KIAYIAS Aris 2% 12% 31% 35% 18% 3%
62 YI William - 5% 24% 38% 25% 7% 1%
63 ORLOV Dmitriy - 3% 15% 33% 32% 14% 2%
64 ORNELAS Matteo 17% 39% 31% 11% 2% - -
65 MEJIA MATTHEW D. - 1% 6% 25% 41% 24% 3%
66 HOSKERI Anik S. - 2% 10% 27% 37% 21% 3%
67 LIU Ethan - 2% 13% 33% 36% 15% 2%
68 TANG Albert - 1% 8% 29% 40% 21% 2%
69 LI Jett 1% 12% 32% 34% 17% 4% -
70 TANG August L. - 1% 9% 30% 41% 18% 1%
71 ZHAO Adam - 7% 26% 37% 23% 6% -
72 SHAPIRO Leon 1% 14% 35% 34% 13% 2% -
73 YAO Bradley 1% 10% 27% 35% 21% 5% -
74 SHAGIDANYAN German - 1% 10% 29% 38% 20% 3%
75 SONG Noel 2% 11% 29% 34% 19% 4% -
76 GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas 11% 34% 36% 16% 3% -
77 HUANG Eythan 3% 18% 35% 31% 11% 1%
78 LEE Brendan 1% 9% 28% 39% 21% 3%
79 SENIC Lucas 3% 18% 37% 31% 10% 1%
80 TAN Aidan - 3% 16% 34% 33% 12% 1%
81 HAN Changhee - - 3% 19% 39% 30% 8%
82 XU Andy P. 1% 14% 33% 32% 16% 4% -
83 LEVY Jacob 1% 11% 31% 36% 18% 4% -
84 MA Andrew - 1% 10% 27% 36% 21% 4%
85 CHOI Mason 1% 11% 30% 34% 19% 5% -
86 ZHEN Ethan - 2% 15% 37% 34% 11% 1%
86 KIM Daniel Y. - 5% 19% 35% 30% 10% 1%
88 PARK Rion 1% 7% 29% 39% 20% 4% -
89 EDWARDS Maxon 1% 12% 33% 34% 17% 4% -
90 TRAUGOT Owen G. - 1% 8% 29% 41% 20%
91 MCISAAC Finn 3% 20% 38% 29% 9% 1%
92 MAO Lucas 3% 15% 33% 33% 14% 2%
93 KAPOOR Aayan 12% 33% 35% 17% 4% -
94 WU Lucas 6% 27% 38% 23% 6% -
95 LIU Zixian (Aaron) 8% 30% 38% 20% 4% -
96 CHEN Kyle P. 10% 34% 37% 16% 3% -
97 GUTH Joseph 7% 27% 37% 23% 6% 1%
98 TIKHAEV Alexander 1% 7% 26% 39% 23% 4%
99 DOELL Ethan 6% 25% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
100 LYNCH Owen C. 10% 31% 35% 19% 5% 1% -
101 SHENG Dalton 3% 16% 35% 31% 13% 2% -
102 ALVAREZ ADRIAN ALEJANDRO 8% 33% 38% 17% 3% - -
103 JIANG Bowang 1% 12% 33% 36% 16% 3% -
104 FUKUDA Diego - 5% 19% 35% 30% 10% 1%
105 KETTELLE John 1% 9% 29% 36% 20% 5% -
106 FOURNET-FAYARD Aldric 10% 38% 37% 13% 2% - -
107 PALMA Nathan Anthony 2% 20% 40% 29% 9% 1% -
107 LI Allen 3% 19% 37% 30% 10% 1% -
109 CHUANG Oscar 4% 21% 37% 27% 9% 1% -
110 VANOYEN Dominick 4% 21% 35% 28% 10% 2% -
111 BHAN Amar 61% 33% 6% 1% - - -
112 LEE Jayden J. 25% 42% 25% 7% 1% -
113 KIM Brian 15% 36% 33% 13% 2% -
114 GE Daniel 17% 38% 31% 12% 2% - -
115 BRAIZINHA Thomas 5% 28% 42% 21% 4% - -
116 CHO Xzander 9% 32% 38% 17% 3% - -
117 AGRAWAL Niki 20% 41% 29% 9% 1% - -
118 WANG Rory 19% 40% 30% 10% 2% - -
119 GAO Payton 5% 30% 40% 21% 5% - -
120 CHOI Benjamin 15% 40% 34% 10% 1% - -
121 CHEN Kelton 17% 38% 31% 12% 2% - -
122 BELOKON Sammy 52% 38% 9% 1% - - -
123 KOVACS Wyatt 10% 32% 36% 18% 4% -
124 CHEN Hanson 18% 40% 31% 10% 1% -
125 HE Kyle 27% 43% 24% 6% 1% -
126 TAM Kyle 58% 36% 6% - - - -
127 YAN James 44% 40% 13% 2% - - -
128 BAI Brian 64% 30% 5% - - - -
129 DHOKTE Neev 19% 53% 24% 4% - - -
130 WANDJI Noah 15% 39% 33% 11% 1% - -
131 FENG Michael 14% 40% 34% 10% 1% - -
132 LEE Eugene 14% 38% 34% 13% 2% -
133 HUTH Trevor 10% 31% 36% 19% 4% -
134 MA Bryant - 7% 32% 39% 18% 3% -
135 YU William 25% 45% 25% 5% - - -
136 GUEVARA Isaac 9% 33% 37% 18% 4% - -
137 LAO Kevin 36% 43% 18% 3% - - -
138 ZHANG Lucas 14% 35% 33% 14% 3% - -
139 RIPA Joseph K. 37% 45% 15% 2% - - -
139 MCKEE Calvin 81% 17% 1% - - - -
141 XIE Buster 9% 30% 36% 20% 5% 1% -
142 SHANNON Jack 26% 48% 22% 4% - - -
143 WONG Evan 5% 29% 39% 21% 5% 1% -
144 SMOLICH Marat 34% 43% 19% 4% - -
145 ZAIDI Adil 25% 44% 25% 5% 1% - -
146 BOWLES Kevin 59% 34% 7% 1% - - -
147 YOON Junhyeok 13% 44% 32% 10% 1% - -
148 ZAPPALA Nikolai 48% 40% 11% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.