Phoenix Convention Center - Phoenix, AZ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HUANG Dongrong | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 57% |
2 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 46% | 23% |
3 | KAO Castor T. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% | |
3 | LEWIS Paul D. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
5 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 41% | 34% |
6 | MITBERG Gregory W. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% |
7 | DESANDO Michael R. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
8 | JAIN Aditya | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
9 | MIN Eric | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
10 | LEE Chris | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% |
11 | DESHMUKH Arjun | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
12 | LIN James G. | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% | |
13 | ADLER David R. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
14 | LIN Michael | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
15 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% | |
16 | SHA Yi Peng | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
17 | BURKE Spencer W. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% | |
18 | SONG Leonardo T. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 37% |
19 | SONG Aiden S. | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
20 | DETERING Julian | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
21 | GUTIERREZ Nikolai A. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
22 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% | |
23 | AHN Jun | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
24 | LOVE Aaron | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
25 | PO Oliver | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% |
26 | MATSAKH Philip | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | - |
27 | JAUME Andrei | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
28 | OH SEAN | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
29 | LI Arvin | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
30 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | |
31 | KIM Jackson | 2% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
32 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
33 | KIM Ryan Y. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
34 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
35 | SEZER Kaya | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% |
36 | JITTAN daniel | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
37 | STRUGAR Marcus A. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
37 | CANLAS Nathan | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
39 | WANG Winston | 3% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 6% | - | |
40 | JI Aidan Y. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
40 | NGUYEN Martin | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
42 | BELLUOMO David C. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
43 | LE Jacob W. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
44 | BALL James T. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
45 | XIAO EDWARD | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 33% | |
46 | CHENG Nathan | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | |
47 | LEE Jonah | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
48 | KNIZHNIK David | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 13% | |
49 | DESAI Nalin H. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
50 | QIAN Jason H. | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
50 | SICHITIU Alexander | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
52 | YU Anders | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
53 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
54 | SHAGIDANYAN German | 3% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
55 | SIMA Congyu Josh | - | 4% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
55 | WU Alistair | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
57 | CHENG Jonathan | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
58 | LEE Jacob | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
59 | BARTEL Jacob L. | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
60 | LOCKWOOD Owen | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
60 | GRANT Lachlan K. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 4% |
62 | MIALL Steven A. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
63 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
64 | ACHILOV Sayid | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
65 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
66 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
67 | WOO Christian | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
68 | CO Dylan | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
69 | BING Charles | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
69 | WANG Mason | 2% | 13% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
71 | PYO Michael M. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 16% |
72 | GRISWOLD Abel B. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
73 | RUFFNER Blake W. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
74 | KEE Andrew L. | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% | |
75 | GAO William | 1% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
76 | SEAL Maximus R. | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
77 | SAGE Michael P. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
78 | DINSAY Kristjan | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
79 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
80 | ELKOUSY Laith H. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
81 | BAE Kevin | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
82 | JOSEPH Willem | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
83 | ROSE Ben | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
84 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | - | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
85 | OH Jaden | 3% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
86 | LLIDO Soren | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
87 | TSAO Lukas | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
88 | LI Matthew | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
89 | WONG Garrick G. | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 9% | |
90 | MOORE Jeremy S. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 39% | 11% | |
91 | VALOUEV Aleksey | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
92 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
93 | LEE Eugene | 28% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
94 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | |
95 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
96 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 3% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
97 | DOBBINS Evan W. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 6% |
97 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
99 | LI Eric | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
100 | GONG Benjamin | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
101 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
102 | SCHLESINGER Nathan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
103 | FINNEY Lorenz | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
103 | WANG Brian | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
105 | GUO Sean | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
106 | KIM Daniel Y. | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
107 | MAO Lucas | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
108 | PAI Lakshan K. | 4% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
109 | DIERKS Kian | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
110 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
111 | KRYLTSOV Michael | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
112 | MORROW Brenden | 8% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
113 | TEMPLE Jackson | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
114 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
115 | TANG Albert | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
116 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 3% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
116 | YAO Bradley | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
118 | GRIFFIN John O. | - | - | 1% | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
119 | STACKHOUSE Andre L. | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
120 | KHER Roan | 15% | 38% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
120 | HUANG Eythan | 3% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
122 | WU Trevor | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
122 | MCISAAC Finn | 4% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
124 | GOBBO Alexander | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
125 | LONG Quinton R. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
125 | FINLEY Dylan | 4% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
127 | LING Eddie | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
128 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
129 | ANDRIC Borna | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
130 | WILKINS Mateo | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
131 | CAPRA Ethan | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
132 | DRESSEL Jet | 8% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
133 | EDWARDS Maxon | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
134 | LEVY Jacob | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
135 | MA Andrew | 2% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
136 | EDISON Ansel | 20% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
137 | SMITH Erick | 6% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | |
137 | KIM Adrian | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
139 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
140 | LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
141 | PAN Henry | 2% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
142 | LAM Nicolas | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
143 | QUINONES Diego A. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
144 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
144 | GUO Justin | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
146 | SCHEUERMANN Andrew G. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
146 | ANDERSON Jacob | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
148 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
148 | YAP Nathan | 5% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
150 | JIANG Bowang | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
151 | TONKOVICH Ryan | 25% | 45% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
152 | SANTIAGO Elias | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
153 | TALASILA Arush | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
154 | LIPPMAN Sam | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
155 | LYNCH Owen C. | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
156 | SINHA Verdhaan | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
157 | SONG Austin | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
158 | SETLUR Bhrugu | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
159 | LI Avery Peihong | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
160 | KLYCZEK Andrew | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
161 | TANG August L. | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
162 | LIU William | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
163 | CHEZ Nolan | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
164 | JEFFERY Jakob | 29% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
164 | SURESH Rohan | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
166 | GORDON William L. | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
167 | LEE Jayden | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
168 | BAI Brian | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.