Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CALDERON Diego | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
2 | JIN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | 5% |
3 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 24% |
3 | WANG DEVON | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 27% |
5 | SODERBERG Alex Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 32% |
6 | LO Jake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
7 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | |
8 | GAO Chaney C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
9 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% |
10 | CHIEN Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% |
11 | MCDANIELS Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 39% |
12 | WILSON Brent (Brent Wilson) A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 18% | |
13 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
14 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
15 | YU Austin | 100% | 87% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | |
16 | FU Leon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% | |
17 | MA Victor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
18 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 9% |
19 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | 4% |
20 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
21 | ZHENG Haoran | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% | |
22 | YAMASAKI Kyle A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% | |
23 | HIGGINS Branford | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
24 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
25 | KIM Sterling S. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
26 | VILLALOBOSKOWALSKI Demetrious C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
27 | MIAO KUNQI | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
28 | LIPTON Jason S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% |
29 | YAO Derek (Shunyu) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
30 | DOWDELL Riley | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
31 | PHAM Sawyer T. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
32 | WANG zhixing (Daniel) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
33 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
34 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 8% |
35 | STRAUSS Luke | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% | |
36 | KIM Ian | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
37 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
38 | CHOI Kaiden I. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | - |
39 | FANG Hanning | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
40 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
41 | UVAROV Andrii | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
42 | CHUNG Ethan Sheng Xuan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
43 | OBERDERFER Vladimir | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
44 | ZHUANG William | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 18% | 2% | - |
45 | TSANG Gary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 25% |
46 | LIU Yikun | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
47 | LEE Chun Po | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
48 | GU Aidan | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
49 | JU Hanul | 100% | 75% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
50 | MCADOO Declan | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
51 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
52 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
53 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
53 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
55 | SPEICHER Brian E. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
56 | GENCHEV Madav | 100% | 66% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
57 | LIU Yueri | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
58 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
59 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
60 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | |
61 | LEE Damien | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
62 | BUI James H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
63 | ZHU Eric | 100% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
64 | SHEN Jiayi | 100% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
65 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | |
66 | TONG Samuel | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
67 | SPEICHER Eric V. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
68 | MENDOZA Zandro | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
69 | SUVOROV Yuly | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% | |
70 | CHIEN Zachary M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 20% | 3% | |
71 | ZONE Liam | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
72 | LEE Bryson | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
73 | MING Nathan | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
74 | WILLIAMS Terrill D. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
75 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
76 | PAN Tristan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
77 | MERRIAM Isaiah G. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
77 | JOHNSTON Conner S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 14% |
79 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
80 | HE Lingyun Matthew | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
81 | WAI Andreas | 100% | 88% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
82 | MUNOZ Humberto | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | |
83 | EVERS Gabriel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
84 | LI Ethan R. | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
85 | BUERGISSER Kai | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
85 | LI zerong | 100% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
87 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
88 | CHIEN William | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
89 | THOMAS Michael | 100% | 86% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
90 | SIM Ian | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
91 | DU Daniel | 100% | 83% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
92 | FAN Beichen | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 2% | |
93 | BRAHMBHATT Krishna | 100% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.