La Jolla, CA - La Jolla, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | MARKOTA Vedran | V V V D D D | V V V V V V | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
2 | WEI Zikun | V V D D V V | V V V V V D | 5.4 | 4 | -1.4 |
3 | CANDELA Nicholas | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
3 | SHARMA Sanil | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
5 | LEE Aaron Y. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
6 | LEVY Zachari I. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
7 | NGUYEN Ethan D. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
8 | CHON Joshua | D D V D D D | V V V V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
9 | ZHU Wilson | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
10 | JUNG Alexander | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
11 | WELLS Tommy R. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
12 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | V V V V D | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
13 | SCRIBNER Aidan C. | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
14 | LOYA Fernando | D V D V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
15 | PAEK Alex J. | D D V V V D | V V V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
16 | ZHANG Eric | D V D D V | V V V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
17 | JEONG Connor | V V V V V V | V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
18 | LIN Ryan | V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
19 | RANGEL Arturo | D V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
20 | MOHEBI Saam | V V D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
21 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
22 | PROCTOR Oliver L. | V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
23 | LEE Alexander G. | V V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
24 | JIN Nicholas | V D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
25 | MENEGOLI Lorenzo | V V D V D V | V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
25 | MOSES Alexander | V V D V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
27 | CHAVARIN Gustavos L. | V D D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
28 | CHU Anthony | V V D D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
29 | LIANG Aaron | D D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
30 | LI Henry | V D D V V D | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
31 | SINGHA Orion | V D V D D V | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
32 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | D D V V D | V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
33 | PHEN Justin P. | D V V V V V | D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
34 | WANG Nathan | V V V D V V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
35 | USHER Alexander | V D V V V V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
36 | DAO Matthew M. | V V V V D | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
37 | ZHU Max | V V D V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
38 | TERRELL Theodore M. | V V V V D | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
39 | CHO Tyler H. | V D V V D V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
40 | WILKENS Zach Q. | V V D V V D | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
41 | AHN Gus | D D V V V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
42 | LOUIE Jason | V V D V D V | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
43 | ZHOU Alec Q. | V D V D V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
44 | GILONI Kevin | V V V V D D | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
45 | MAENG Jake W. | V V D D V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
46 | TARBUSKOVICH III John | V D V D V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
47 | ZHOU Alan | D V V V D D | D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
48 | SCHENCK Theo | D V V D D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
49 | SPEICHER Brian E. | D V V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
50 | LOGUE Ethan D. | D V D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
51 | ROMERO Caleb E. | V D D D V V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
52 | LEE Matthew C. | V D D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
53 | JIN daniel | D D D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
54 | KAJI Ty | V V V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
55 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | V D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
56 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | D D V V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
57 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | D V D D V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
58 | MATTIS George | D D V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
59 | DYER Carson C. | V D V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
60 | MA Victor | V D D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
61 | KIM Sterling S. | V V D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
62 | COOPER Rowan | D V D V D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
63 | WOMACH Tristan | D D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
64 | GRAYSON Shane W. | D D V D D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
65 | DESOUZA Hansel S. | V V D D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
66 | RAJPAL Sartaj S. | D D V D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
67 | KOH Tommy | D V D D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
68 | EASTMAN Blake C. | D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
69 | BRADLEY Noah W. | D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
70 | PHUKAN Rohin | D D D V D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
71 | BORLAND Isaac | D D D D V | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
72 | LEON Sebastian | V D D D D D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
73 | KOSLU Aidan D. | D D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
74 | NG Alexander M. | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
75 | SOOHOO Jackson F. | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
76 | WESTON Tom | D D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
77 | FOREMAN Alexander E. | D D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
78 | BHARGAV Siddharth | D D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
79 | HUSSAIN Kamran | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
80 | WONG Daniel | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
81 | MUIR Douglas K. | D D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
82 | LIU David L. | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
83 | FEES HOLDEN | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
84 | ESTRADA Luke | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
85 | COMER Alexander J. | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
86 | IRVING Harrison | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
87 | BAKER William | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.