Hackensack, NJ - Hackensack, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HE Lawrence | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 43% | 13% | |
| 2 | SHAH Maximilian A. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
| 3 | LEE Noah | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
| 3 | CHOI Mason | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 5 | WU Joseph | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 6 | LONCAR Luka E. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 7 | BORODITSKY Ethan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 42% | 21% |
| 8 | WU Marcus | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 9 | BEZRODNOV Michael | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 10% |
| 10 | JUN Jaywu | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% |
| 11 | STEWART Charlie | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 12 | GOHEL Dayus T. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 45% | |
| 13 | KOBI Samuel | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 4% |
| 14 | SKAALAND Will | 1% | 13% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | |
| 15 | MISHIMA Torata | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | TAHOUN Aly | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 17 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 18 | EKE Frank | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% |
| 19 | PRIHODKO Max | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
| 20 | PARK Frederick | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 21 | SKORUPAN Grant | - | 3% | 21% | 41% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 23 | ZHANG Ryan | 5% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 24 | GONG Haixiang | 44% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 25 | JOSLIN Tyler | 5% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 26 | GAO Daniel | 22% | 48% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 27 | BHATIA Rahil | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 28 | RAKOWSKY Luke | 32% | 47% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 29 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | 1% | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 30 | MING Isaac | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 31 | KUMAR Aidan | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 2% |
| 32 | LEE Hudson | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 33 | ZHANG Zixian (Shawn) | - | 5% | 26% | 44% | 22% | 3% | |
| 34 | XIE Brandon | 1% | 14% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 35 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 3% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 36 | LAI Aiden | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 37 | STEPHENSON Jacob | 35% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 37 | WU Jonathan | 20% | 46% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | WANG Max S | 48% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | DOWD Peter L. | 45% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 40 | KUBATIN Anton V. | 53% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.