Hackensack, NJ - Hackensack, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 13% | |
| 2 | SHAH Maximilian A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
| 3 | LEE Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 3 | CHOI Mason | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 5 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 6 | LONCAR Luka E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 7 | BORODITSKY Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 21% |
| 8 | WU Marcus | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 9 | BEZRODNOV Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 10% |
| 10 | JUN Jaywu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
| 11 | STEWART Charlie | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 12 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 45% | |
| 13 | KOBI Samuel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 4% |
| 14 | SKAALAND Will | 100% | 99% | 86% | 47% | 12% | 1% | |
| 15 | MISHIMA Torata | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 16 | TAHOUN Aly | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 17 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 18 | EKE Frank | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% |
| 19 | PRIHODKO Max | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
| 20 | PARK Frederick | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 21 | SKORUPAN Grant | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 23 | ZHANG Ryan | 100% | 95% | 69% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 24 | GONG Haixiang | 100% | 56% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 25 | JOSLIN Tyler | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 26 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 78% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 27 | BHATIA Rahil | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 28 | RAKOWSKY Luke | 100% | 68% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 29 | NOVOJILOV Alexei | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 30 | MING Isaac | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 31 | KUMAR Aidan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 21% | 2% |
| 32 | LEE Hudson | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 33 | ZHANG Zixian (Shawn) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 25% | 3% | |
| 34 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 99% | 85% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 35 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 100% | 97% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 36 | LAI Aiden | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 37 | STEPHENSON Jacob | 100% | 65% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 37 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 80% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | WANG Max S | 100% | 52% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | DOWD Peter L. | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 40 | KUBATIN Anton V. | 100% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.