Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% |
2 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% | |
3 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
3 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% |
5 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
6 | DESHMUKH Arjun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 31% |
7 | ROSE Ben | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 31% | |
8 | HAN Changhee | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
9 | LEWIS Akhil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
10 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
11 | CO Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 22% | |
12 | TANG Owen S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% |
13 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
14 | ORR Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% |
15 | QIAN Jason H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% |
16 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% |
17 | KIM Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
18 | MATSAKH Philip | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% | |
19 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% | |
20 | WONG Adrian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
21 | WANG Mason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 9% |
22 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 9% |
23 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 5% |
24 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% |
25 | PARK Jason B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 12% | |
26 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
27 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
28 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
29 | AKYAMAC Bora | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 24% | 2% |
30 | TANG August L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 4% |
31 | BLACK Zachary | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | |
32 | WANG Winston | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 8% | |
33 | LING Eddie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | |
34 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 15% |
35 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 26% |
36 | NGUYEN Martin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 10% |
37 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
38 | MCISAAC Finn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
39 | LI Samuel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% | |
40 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
41 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 2% |
42 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 5% |
43 | FENG Michael | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
44 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
45 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
46 | LEE Eugene | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
47 | SONG Austin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
48 | NICOLETTI Luca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
49 | RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
50 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
51 | LORENZO Alejandro | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - |
52 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 30% |
53 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
54 | LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
55 | STRINGER David | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
56 | XU Xinhao ( Sonny) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 4% |
57 | DERRICK Blake | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
58 | KIM Minhyeok | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
59 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% | |
60 | VISHAWADIA Jaimin | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
61 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
62 | MAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% | |
63 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
64 | XU Ethan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
65 | SONG Noel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% | |
66 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% | 2% |
67 | MARTIN Darius | 100% | 96% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
68 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
69 | PO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | |
70 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 22% | 2% | |
71 | VANOYEN Dominick | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
72 | KOVACS Wyatt | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 11% | - |
73 | SHAPIRO Leon | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
74 | GUO Justin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 1% |
75 | WU Alber Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
76 | PARK Rion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% |
77 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
77 | WU Trevor | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
79 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 31% |
80 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 9% |
80 | KRYLTSOV Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 15% |
82 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
83 | ZHAO Adam | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | |
84 | CHEN Hanson | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 3% | |
85 | MA Bryant | 100% | 100% | 88% | 47% | 11% | 1% | |
86 | JIANG Bowang | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
87 | HUA Aaron | 100% | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
88 | SHANNON Jack | 100% | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
89 | LEVY Jacob | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - |
90 | BAI Brian | 100% | 90% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
91 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
91 | DOELL Ethan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | - |
93 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
94 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 87% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
95 | EDWARDS Maxon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
95 | SUAREZ Adrian | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
97 | WANG Rory | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - |
98 | CLARK Benjamin | 100% | 89% | 50% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
99 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - |
100 | TANG Albert | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | 9% | |
101 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 10% | 1% | |
102 | WONG Antonio | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 21% | 3% | |
103 | FEDELI Francesco | 100% | 81% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
104 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 98% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
105 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | |
106 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
107 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 87% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
108 | KIM Brian | 100% | 100% | 92% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - |
109 | WANG Brian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
110 | CHANG Nathan | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
111 | XIE Buster | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
112 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
113 | SENIC Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
114 | CHUANG Oscar | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
115 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
116 | ORNELAS Matteo | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
117 | LE Jacob H. | 100% | 90% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | |
118 | QIU Zhaocheng | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
119 | HOLLIS Sean | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
120 | MILLER Jordan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
121 | HUANG Eythan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
122 | PARRISH Evan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
123 | JURMAN Therin | 100% | 97% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
124 | EDISON Ansel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% | - |
124 | YAP Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
126 | VADEN Oliver | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
127 | SMOLICH Marat | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
128 | YU William | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
129 | PETROV Mikhail | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
130 | ELKOUSY Zain al Din | 100% | 95% | 67% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
131 | BAE Eugene | 100% | 99% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
132 | BRAIZINHA Thomas | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | |
133 | RAJ Jay | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
134 | COSSROW Alex | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
135 | HE Kyle | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
136 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
137 | ZAIDI Adil | 100% | 94% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
138 | MODADUGU Aryan | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
139 | GUEVARA Isaac | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
140 | MCKEE Calvin | 100% | 73% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
141 | DHANOA Kian | 100% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
142 | EGE Nathan | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
143 | WOODCOCK Henry | 100% | 82% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
144 | LIM Charlie | 100% | 83% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
145 | POWELL Sean | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
145 | KUE Temujin | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
147 | SUN Ryan | 100% | 85% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
148 | GRIEB Oliver | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
149 | SEMP Iain | 100% | 95% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | |
150 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
150 | REAUME Nate | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
152 | ZOU Michael | 100% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
153 | WANDJI Noah | 100% | 90% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
153 | ZMUDA Aiden | 100% | 48% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
155 | MENDEZ Ren | 100% | 11% | - | - | - | - | |
156 | XU Dinghui Ryan | 100% | 92% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - |
157 | KRZYWON Dylan | 100% | 36% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
157 | PAN Ethan | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
159 | ZHANG Lucas | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
160 | CHUN Alexander | 100% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - |
160 | CHUN Zachary | 100% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.