Brockport, NY - Brockport, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KASI Sanjay | V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 2 | CHENG Jonathan | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 3 | PELOSKY Zack B. | D V V V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 3 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 5 | MARX Oscar L. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 6 | ZHANG Henry C. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 7 | ZHANG Yun Isaac | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 8 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 9 | KIM Yonjae | V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 10 | WU Nicholas | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 11 | PYO Michael M. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 12 | KIM Tei D. | V V D D V V | V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 13 | KAO Castor T. | D V D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 14 | LI Richard | V D V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 15 | KULKARNI Ansh A. | V D D D D | V V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 16 | REEVES Liam | V D D D D D | V V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 17 | NAGER Noah | V D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 18 | BREIER Matthew F. | V V V D V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | V D V V V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 20 | BAS Liam | D V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 21 | DAI Jonathan T. | V D D V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 22 | MARX Jackson L. | V V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 23 | ORR Spencer | D V D V V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 24 | LE Vyn A. | V V V D D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 25 | RUSADZE Nickolas | V V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 26 | BING Charles | V D D V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 27 | LEE Aidan | V V D D V D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 28 | ZHAI Jeffrey | V D V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 29 | ORVANANOS Jorge | D D D V V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 30 | YANG Luao | D V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 31 | CULLIVAN Justice | D D V D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 32 | ZHAO Jesse | D V D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 33 | WU Jerry | V V V V D | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 34 | KEE Andrew L. | D V V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 36 | LI Eric | D V V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 38 | FU Yifan | D D V D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 39 | DOUGLAS Oscar M. | V D V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 40 | HONG Issac | V D V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 41 | ANTON Nathaniel | V D V D D D | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 42 | BASOK Nikita | D D V D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 43 | TALLARICO Matthew | D V D D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 44 | TORRES Treston | D D V V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 45 | TAN Connor | V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 46 | WANG Gerald Y. | D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 47 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | D D D D V | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 48 | DEGROOT Blake | D D D V D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 49 | PO Oliver | V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 50 | DING Tom Zitong | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 51 | CHEN Derek | D D D V D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 52 | LIGOS Alex M. | D D D D D V | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 53 | CHAN Justin D. | D V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 54 | KLYCZEK Andrew | D D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 55 | LIU Ryan | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 55 | SOLDATOV Faddey | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 57 | ZHANG Mark | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.