2019 USA Fencing Anaheim SJCC Tournament

Junior Men's Épée

Sunday, March 17, 2019 at 12:30 PM

Anaheim , CA - Anaheim, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 KAMBESELES Peter G. - - 2% 11% 30% 39% 19%
2 LEE Aaron Y. - - 4% 17% 33% 33% 13%
3 RAYLE Evan K. - - 1% 8% 27% 42% 22%
3 CANDELA Nicholas - - 1% 10% 30% 41% 18%
5 LEI Joshua - 1% 5% 20% 36% 29% 8%
6 MATVEEV Valentin S. - - 1% 6% 22% 42% 30%
7 NGUYEN Ethan D. - - 2% 13% 32% 37% 16%
8 MOOSEKIAN Stafford - 1% 4% 17% 34% 32% 12%
9 NORBUTAS Jackson S. - 2% 12% 30% 37% 18%
10 SHIN Joshua - - - 3% 18% 43% 36%
11 TAE William G. 1% 10% 31% 36% 18% 3%
12 WESTEN Zachary (Zack) C. - 4% 16% 32% 31% 15% 3%
13 LEE Ryan - 2% 13% 32% 37% 16%
14 SPIER Julian H. - 1% 7% 25% 42% 25%
15 ZAFFT Maximo S. - 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5%
16 WANG Nathan - 1% 7% 22% 35% 27% 8%
17 SHUGART Henry R. - - 2% 11% 32% 41% 15%
18 FORTNER Lance R. - 3% 14% 29% 32% 17% 4%
19 RUSSANOV Boris J. - 2% 13% 31% 34% 16% 3%
20 HILBERT Xavier - 1% 10% 31% 40% 18%
21 WEI Zikun - 1% 8% 27% 40% 23%
22 RHYU Kozmo - 6% 25% 38% 24% 7% 1%
23 WELLS Tommy R. - 3% 14% 32% 33% 16% 3%
24 CAI Kevin P. - 1% 9% 27% 36% 22% 4%
25 LIN Ryan - 1% 6% 22% 36% 27% 7%
26 DESOUZA Hansel S. 1% 6% 20% 33% 28% 11% 2%
27 SHACKLEFORD Aidan J. 1% 8% 25% 37% 24% 6%
28 ROBINSON Riley 1% 7% 23% 36% 26% 7%
29 SHUR Yakov C. 4% 18% 34% 30% 13% 2%
30 DAO Matthew M. - - 1% 8% 28% 42% 21%
30 CHIN Ethan - 5% 18% 32% 30% 13% 2%
32 YUMIACO Nolan C. 2% 13% 32% 34% 16% 3% -
33 INSLER Gabriel C. - - 1% 8% 25% 40% 25%
34 ZHU Wilson - 3% 15% 34% 35% 13%
35 GAIDAR Daniel B. - - 2% 10% 29% 39% 20%
36 MUN Michael K. - - - 3% 19% 44% 33%
37 VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. - 2% 14% 33% 35% 15% 2%
38 JEONG Connor - - 1% 9% 31% 42% 16%
39 IVE Isaac L. - 1% 5% 21% 36% 29% 9%
40 SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. - 1% 8% 27% 37% 22% 5%
41 ZHOU Alan - - 1% 9% 28% 40% 22%
42 ZHANG Eric - 1% 9% 29% 40% 19%
43 FARQUHARSON Cole 3% 15% 34% 33% 14% 2%
44 PLUMER Jack E. 6% 24% 37% 25% 8% 1%
45 MACHULSKY Ned - 3% 15% 34% 35% 13%
46 MCDERMOTT Brian 1% 7% 26% 38% 23% 5%
47 LEE Alexander G. - 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3%
48 MOHEBI Saam - - 4% 19% 41% 29% 6%
49 JEON Alexander E. - 3% 19% 36% 29% 10% 1%
50 ROY Joseph T. - 1% 5% 20% 36% 29% 9%
51 MILAM Hugh - - 1% 8% 27% 42% 22%
52 LEI Jacob - 2% 14% 32% 33% 15% 2%
53 LIU Alexander - 2% 11% 29% 35% 20% 4%
54 DEO Ameya 11% 38% 35% 13% 2% - -
55 MAENG Jake W. 1% 7% 22% 34% 26% 9% 1%
56 KAJI Ty 1% 13% 35% 35% 13% 2% -
57 DE JONG Thijmen J. 1% 6% 24% 38% 26% 6%
58 KOKENGE Clark 4% 21% 36% 28% 10% 1%
59 VELO Juan Manuel H. 22% 41% 28% 8% 1% -
60 KIM PAUL 1% 10% 27% 35% 21% 5% -
61 ROMERO Caleb E. 27% 43% 23% 6% 1% -
62 DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. 16% 37% 32% 13% 2% -
63 LUCERO-OLSON Aydin 5% 24% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
64 NG Alexander M. 8% 29% 37% 21% 5% 1%
65 ALAIMO Charles - 3% 16% 35% 32% 12% 2%
66 KAMBESELES Jack M. - 1% 7% 21% 35% 28% 8%
67 USHER Alexander 1% 11% 29% 34% 19% 5% 1%
68 MIELE Benjamin - 1% 8% 24% 35% 25% 7%
69 LIANG Aaron 2% 12% 29% 33% 19% 5% -
70 CHAVARIN Gustavos L. 2% 14% 32% 34% 15% 2%
71 LEVY Zachari I. 1% 8% 25% 37% 24% 6%
72 LEE Timothy S. 5% 21% 35% 28% 10% 1%
73 SCRIBNER Aidan C. 22% 40% 28% 9% 1% -
74 THORNE Casey B. 1% 6% 21% 33% 27% 11% 2%
75 RAJPAL Sartaj S. - 2% 15% 33% 33% 15% 2%
76 DORRELL Connor I. 2% 14% 31% 32% 16% 4% -
77 YOON Nathan 1% 14% 35% 33% 14% 3% -
78 ARABACI Jack A. 8% 34% 39% 17% 3% - -
79 GHILDIYAL Manyu 3% 17% 36% 30% 12% 2% -
80 BARRY Dominick 2% 16% 35% 31% 12% 2% -
81 LOUIE Jason 25% 45% 24% 6% 1% - -
82 IYOKI Kent - - 5% 21% 42% 32%
83 ZHOU Alec Q. 19% 42% 29% 9% 1% -
84 ZHU Max 7% 27% 37% 23% 6% 1%
85 DOLMETSCH Max 30% 45% 20% 4% - - -
86 SOOHOO Jackson F. 9% 39% 35% 14% 3% - -
87 CHUNG Thomas 9% 30% 35% 19% 5% 1% -
88 OGILVIE Evan C. - 6% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1%
89 SOLTER Kai 26% 41% 25% 7% 1% - -
90 MOSES Alexander - 4% 18% 35% 30% 11% 2%
91 KANG Michael H. - 1% 7% 25% 37% 25% 6%
92 XU Zitong (Evan) 4% 20% 36% 29% 10% 1%
93 LI Brian X 6% 24% 35% 25% 9% 1%
94 HE Jason 25% 41% 25% 7% 1% -
95 LEHR William D. 1% 9% 27% 36% 22% 5%
96 YULE Alexander L. 3% 16% 34% 32% 14% 2%
97 ZIEBART Jeremy J. 13% 35% 34% 15% 3% -
98 KIM Benjamin I. 15% 38% 33% 12% 2% -
99 JUNG Alexander 4% 22% 37% 26% 9% 1% -
100 LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. 1% 7% 23% 34% 25% 9% 1%
101 LEE Matthew C. 1% 7% 26% 36% 23% 6% 1%
102 SMITH Zane A. 10% 30% 35% 19% 5% 1% -
103 MENDOZA Zachari - 5% 22% 37% 27% 8% 1%
104 FOREMAN Alexander E. 17% 39% 31% 11% 2% - -
105 DUONG Enoch 10% 34% 36% 16% 4% - -
105 WOMACH Tristan 4% 24% 38% 25% 8% 1% -
107 KOPPE Alexander 32% 43% 20% 4% - - -
108 SHOURIE Jai 7% 34% 38% 17% 4% - -
109 HU Matthew 26% 43% 24% 6% 1% - -
109 KOPPE Benjamin 39% 42% 16% 3% - - -
111 GARRETT Samuel 20% 47% 26% 6% 1% - -
112 KIM Sterling S. 33% 41% 20% 5% 1% - -
113 ZHENG Yuanlong (Bill) 3% 19% 39% 30% 9% 1% -
114 RAKHIMI Marat T. 21% 39% 28% 10% 2% - -
115 INSLER Ethan C. 11% 32% 34% 18% 5% -
116 BORLAND Isaac 49% 39% 11% 1% - - -
117 DAYON Pierre 27% 43% 24% 5% 1% - -
118 STENNIS Brendan 56% 35% 8% 1% - - -
119 MA Victor 60% 34% 6% 1% - - -
120 MILEY Nick N. 45% 43% 11% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.