2019 USA Fencing Anaheim SJCC Tournament

Junior Men's Épée

Sunday, March 17, 2019 at 12:30 PM

Anaheim , CA - Anaheim, CA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 KAMBESELES Peter G. D V V V V V V V V V V V V 4.6 5 +0.4
2 LEE Aaron Y. V V V D V V V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
3 RAYLE Evan K. V D V V V V V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
3 CANDELA Nicholas V V V V D D V V V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
5 LEI Joshua V V V V V V V V V D 4.1 6 +1.9
6 MATVEEV Valentin S. V V V V V V V V V D 4.9 6 +1.1
7 NGUYEN Ethan D. D V D V V V V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
8 MOOSEKIAN Stafford V V D V D V V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
9 NORBUTAS Jackson S. V V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
10 SHIN Joshua D V V V V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
11 TAE William G. V V V D V V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
12 WESTEN Zachary (Zack) C. D V V D V V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
13 LEE Ryan D V V V D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
14 SPIER Julian H. D V V V D V V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
15 ZAFFT Maximo S. V V D D V D V V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
16 WANG Nathan V D D V D D V V V D 4.0 2 -2.0
17 SHUGART Henry R. V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
18 FORTNER Lance R. V V V V V D V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
19 RUSSANOV Boris J. V V V D V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
20 HILBERT Xavier D V V V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
21 WEI Zikun V D V V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
22 RHYU Kozmo D D V V V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
23 WELLS Tommy R. V V V V D D V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
24 CAI Kevin P. D D V V V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
25 LIN Ryan V V V V D D V V D 4.0 4 -
26 DESOUZA Hansel S. D V V V V D V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
27 SHACKLEFORD Aidan J. D V V V D V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
28 ROBINSON Riley V V V D D V V D 3.0 3 -
29 SHUR Yakov C. V D D V V V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
30 DAO Matthew M. V D D V V D V V D 4.7 3 -1.7
30 CHIN Ethan D V V V D D V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
32 YUMIACO Nolan C. V V V D D D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
33 INSLER Gabriel C. V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
34 ZHU Wilson V V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
35 GAIDAR Daniel B. V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
36 MUN Michael K. V V D V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
37 VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. D V V V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
38 JEONG Connor V D V V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
39 IVE Isaac L. V V D V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
40 SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. V V V V D V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
41 ZHOU Alan V V V D V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
42 ZHANG Eric V V V D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
43 FARQUHARSON Cole V D V V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
44 PLUMER Jack E. V D V V V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
45 MACHULSKY Ned V V D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
46 MCDERMOTT Brian V V V V D V D 2.9 4 +1.1
47 LEE Alexander G. D D V V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
48 MOHEBI Saam D V V D V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
49 JEON Alexander E. V D D V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
50 ROY Joseph T. V V V D D V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
51 MILAM Hugh D V D V D V V D 4.8 3 -1.8
52 LEI Jacob D D V D V V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
53 LIU Alexander D V V D D V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
54 DEO Ameya V V V D D D V D 1.6 3 +1.4
55 MAENG Jake W. V D D D V V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
56 KAJI Ty V V D V D D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
57 DE JONG Thijmen J. V V D D D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
58 KOKENGE Clark V D V D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
59 VELO Juan Manuel H. V D D V D V D 1.2 2 +0.8
60 KIM PAUL D V D D D V V D 2.8 2 -0.8
61 ROMERO Caleb E. D D D V D V D 1.1 1 -0.1
62 DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. V D D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
63 LUCERO-OLSON Aydin D D D D D D V D 2.1 0 -2.1
64 NG Alexander M. D D D D D V D 1.9 0 -1.9
65 ALAIMO Charles V V V D V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
66 KAMBESELES Jack M. V D V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
67 USHER Alexander D D V V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
68 MIELE Benjamin D V V V V D D 4.0 4 -
69 LIANG Aaron V D D V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
70 CHAVARIN Gustavos L. V V D V D D 2.5 3 +0.5
71 LEVY Zachari I. D V D V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
72 LEE Timothy S. D V V D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
73 SCRIBNER Aidan C. D V V D V D 1.3 3 +1.7
74 THORNE Casey B. D V D V D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
75 RAJPAL Sartaj S. V V D V D D D 3.5 3 -0.5
76 DORRELL Connor I. V V D D D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
77 YOON Nathan D V D V D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
78 ARABACI Jack A. D V V D V D D 1.7 3 +1.3
79 GHILDIYAL Manyu D D D V V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
80 BARRY Dominick V D D D V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
81 LOUIE Jason V V V D D D D 1.1 3 +1.9
82 IYOKI Kent D D D V V D 4.0 2 -2.0
83 ZHOU Alec Q. D D V D V D 1.3 2 +0.7
84 ZHU Max V D D D V D 2.0 2 -
85 DOLMETSCH Max D D D V D V D 1.0 2 +1.0
86 SOOHOO Jackson F. D D D D V V D 1.6 2 +0.4
87 CHUNG Thomas V D D V D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
88 OGILVIE Evan C. D D V D V D D 3.1 2 -1.1
89 SOLTER Kai D D V D D V D 1.2 2 +0.8
90 MOSES Alexander V D D V D D D 3.3 2 -1.3
91 KANG Michael H. V D D D V D D 3.9 2 -1.9
92 XU Zitong (Evan) D V D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
93 LI Brian X D D D V D D 2.1 1 -1.1
94 HE Jason D V D D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
95 LEHR William D. V D D D D D 2.8 1 -1.8
96 YULE Alexander L. D D D D V D 2.5 1 -1.5
97 ZIEBART Jeremy J. D D D D V D 1.6 1 -0.6
98 KIM Benjamin I. D D V D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
99 JUNG Alexander V D D D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
100 LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. D D D D V D D 3.1 1 -2.1
101 LEE Matthew C. V D D D D D D 3.0 1 -2.0
102 SMITH Zane A. D D D D D V D 1.8 1 -0.8
103 MENDOZA Zachari D V D D D D D 3.1 1 -2.1
104 FOREMAN Alexander E. V D D D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
105 DUONG Enoch D D D V D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
105 WOMACH Tristan D D V D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
107 KOPPE Alexander D D D D V D D 1.0 1 -
108 SHOURIE Jai D D D V D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
109 HU Matthew D D V D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
109 KOPPE Benjamin D D D V D D D 0.8 1 +0.2
111 GARRETT Samuel D V D D D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
112 KIM Sterling S. V D D D D D D 1.0 1 -
113 ZHENG Yuanlong (Bill) D D V D D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
114 RAKHIMI Marat T. D V D D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
115 INSLER Ethan C. D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
116 BORLAND Isaac D D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
117 DAYON Pierre D D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
118 STENNIS Brendan D D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
119 MA Victor D D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
120 MILEY Nick N. D D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.