Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHANG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 29% |
2 | XI Emily | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
3 | FAYEZ Malika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
3 | QI Chelsie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
5 | CHOI Arianna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
6 | SIU Mila | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 7% |
7 | FAN Olivia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
8 | KASHUBA Mila | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | |
9 | XIE ANDREA | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
10 | REN Harper | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
11 | ZHAO Rachel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
12 | LEE Nicole | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
13 | BOUTSIKARIS Asha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
14 | GOFMAN Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% | |
15 | TRIVULCE Scarlett | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
16 | YANG Arianna | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
17 | PATEL Aria | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
18 | KUO Stella | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
19 | LIOU Skylar | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
20 | WANG Michelle | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
21 | YU sage | 100% | 95% | 69% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
22 | YOUNG Penelope | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
23 | PATEL Agena | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
24 | KANDHI Aryaa | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 5% | |
25 | CHEN Reina | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | |
26 | DU Chelsea | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
27 | LI Kayla | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 37% | 12% | 2% |
28 | KWAK Olivia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
29 | CHANEY Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
30 | QIN Olivia | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
31 | WANG Hailie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
32 | LI Juliana | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
33 | WU Angela | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
34 | SALIBA Madison | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
35 | CHOI Noah | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
36 | MAO Faith | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
37 | SHEN Zoey | 100% | 93% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | |
38 | ZHAO Crystal | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
39 | ERATA Selena | 100% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
40 | WANG Katherine | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
41 | LIPANI Angelina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 7% |
42 | BERENSHTEYN Gabriella | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
43 | LEE Gloria | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 7% |
44 | ARONSON Marlie | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - |
45 | KIM Lina | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
46 | LIU Brinley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% | |
47 | SUN Annika | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
48 | CHO Angelina | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
49 | YOON Adeline | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
50 | WANG Jenny wang | 100% | 98% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
51 | LIU Emma | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
51 | LUXIEO Cathy | 100% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
53 | KAUR Harman | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
54 | MISHIMA Quinn | 100% | 96% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
55 | SHI Emma | 100% | 56% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
56 | YOON Michelle | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
57 | SHAHID Huda | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 8% |
58 | BIRZ Vivi | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
59 | KIM Eila | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
60 | YOUN Caila | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.