University of Maryland, Reckord Armory - College Park, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KOKENGE Reid | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
| 2 | O'HARA Keegan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | |
| 3 | CAI Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 3 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% | |
| 5 | PARK Ian C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 55% | |
| 6 | BOUDREAUX James | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 7% | |
| 7 | TIKHONOV Ilia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% | |
| 8 | ZHANG Caden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | |
| 9 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% |
| 10 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 11 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
| 12 | KOEPPEL Levi E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 13 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
| 14 | HONDOR Robert D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | |
| 15 | LEE Samuel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% |
| 16 | CHOI Kaiden I. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 6% | |
| 17 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 23% | |
| 18 | LAM Alan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
| 19 | WICAS Graham E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | |
| 19 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 6% | |
| 21 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 7% | |
| 22 | WANG Aiden | 100% | 95% | 68% | 24% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | 100% | 99% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 24 | ROSE-JONES Simon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | |
| 25 | WANG Clayton | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
| 26 | MARTIN Mason | 100% | 99% | 83% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
| 27 | TIKHONOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 10% |
| 28 | TATE William Isom | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 29 | MEGGERS Davin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 30 | YU Jason | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 31 | CLICK Tristan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% | |
| 32 | BORATGIS Christopher J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
| 33 | SMITH Troy H. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | FISHMAN Rahm | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% | |
| 35 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
| 36 | SINGH Ravin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
| 37 | HULL Liam | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 4% | |
| 38 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% | 6% | |
| 39 | MEGGERS Samuel | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | TIRRELL Justin J. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 41 | HEADRICK Lance | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% |
| 42 | MARTINEZ Joshua | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 43 | ACAR Devin | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 44 | WATERS Nathaniel | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 45 | RUSSELL James | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 10% | 1% | |
| 46 | JIN Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | |
| 47 | EVANS Grant | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
| 48 | PAN Colin | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 2% | |
| 49 | WONG King-Yee | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 50 | PETROW Zoryan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 3% | |
| 51 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
| 52 | CHEN Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 46% | 10% | |
| 53 | SO Lorenzo | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 54 | PENG Yue | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
| 56 | KIM kihyeon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | |
| 57 | CHRISTY Peter C. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
| 58 | LEWIS Jared | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 13% | |
| 59 | COCCHINI Lorenzo | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 60 | MONTESI Eric | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 12% | 1% | |
| 61 | ALEXANDER Jacksen | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 62 | CARTER Austin L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 63 | CHO Alex | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 64 | ALI Farhan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
| 65 | MODANLOU Navid | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
| 66 | BERNARD Jack B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
| 67 | BUCCELLATO Joel S. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 2% | |
| 67 | LEE Matthew | 100% | 88% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 69 | KE Sebastian | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 70 | ANAFI Ari | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 71 | BAGHA Armin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% | |
| 72 | KAPLAN Maddox | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 73 | BEREKNYEI Lukas | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 74 | CAMP Ethan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
| 75 | ESPINAL DAPIC Nicolas | 100% | 95% | 68% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 76 | CHENH Justin | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 77 | HOWARD Jackson | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 78 | MILLER Jordan | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 78 | WALLACE George | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% | |
| 78 | WEHMEYER Devin | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 81 | KYPRAIOS Nicholas | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 2% | |
| 82 | KERKHOF Peter L. | 100% | 88% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 83 | HU Alexander W. | 100% | 94% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 84 | ZHU Yiming | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 85 | ROTONDI Gregory V. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
| 85 | CANDELARIA Armando | 100% | 90% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 87 | LEE Benjamin | 100% | 89% | 51% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 88 | SZIEDE Kieran | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 89 | SAUNIER Cameron | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 10% | |
| 89 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 100% | 97% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 91 | BUI Ryan | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 92 | MARSH Alex | 100% | 92% | 60% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 93 | YANG Gary | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 2% |
| 94 | MONTAGUE Braeden A. | 100% | 91% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 95 | KOKENGE Chad | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 95 | LIN Yufei | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 97 | AKYAMAC Bora | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 3% |
| 98 | SEID Zachary W. | 100% | 86% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 99 | PERILLO Edoardo Filippo Mihai | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 100 | SUNKARA Vishnu | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 101 | YOO Dong Hun | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
| 102 | WU Shaochi | 100% | 87% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 102 | LIN Haley | 100% | 79% | 35% | 7% | - | - | |
| 104 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
| 105 | YI Nathan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% | 1% | |
| 106 | HUTZ Michael B. | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 106 | STOUT Zachary | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 108 | GANZY Ethan | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 109 | ADDYSON Aidan | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 110 | BANNEN Nicholas | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 110 | YIN Chujun | 100% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 112 | PANE Patrick | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 113 | SHARMA Akshay | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 114 | BROSNAN Solomon | 100% | 56% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 115 | STEPANIAN George | 100% | 35% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 116 | LIEMAN David | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 117 | SLOTER Lewis E. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 45% | 8% | - | |
| 118 | YAP Nathan | 100% | 93% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 119 | ZHANG Sen | 100% | 89% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 120 | MANITT Philip | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 121 | ARMSTRONG Gary | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 122 | MARKOWITZ Sam | 100% | 76% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
| 123 | KLINE R. Jay | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 14% | 1% | |
| 123 | JIN Adam | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.