Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WONG Adrian | V V D V V V | V V V V V | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 2 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.9 | 6 | +0.1 |
| 3 | YAO Geoffrey B. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 3 | SHCHUR Landon | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 5 | SKORUPAN Grant | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
| 6 | KATS Dylan G. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 7 | IARIKOV Nicholas | D V V V D D | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 8 | ZHANG Kingston | V D V D D D | V V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 9 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | V V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
| 10 | LEE Samuel Y. | V V V V V V | V D | 2.5 | 6 | +3.5 |
| 11 | SU Caleb | V V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 12 | DODIN David | V V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 13 | KRIVAK Blaise | V V D D V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 14 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | V D V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 15 | SANTOS Francisco M. | V D V V D | V D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
| 16 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | D D D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 17 | LI Matthew | V V D V V V | D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 18 | CHEN Brian | D D V V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | PARK Nicholas | D V V V D V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 20 | BRODSKY Julian | V V D D V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 21 | JIANG Matthew | D D V V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 22 | ZELTSER Eric S. | V D V D D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 23 | WOLFE Alex | V D V D V D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 25 | RACHAMIM Jonathan | V D D V D D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 26 | LURYE Benjamin | D D V D V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 27 | HU Anton | D D D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 28 | LEE Aiden | D D D D V | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 29 | CHAI Ethan | D D D D V D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 30 | MAO Benjamin | V D D D D D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 31 | LI Lianhan | D D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 32 | LUR'YE Killian | D D D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 33 | ROLAND Mackinley | V V D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 34 | FARBER Ian S. | D V D D D V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 35 | ZAPPA Bobby | D D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 36 | SANTOS Antonio K. | D V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 37 | SICARD III Charles | D V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 38 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | D D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 39 | ZENG Andrew | D D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 40 | BRADSHAW Carter | V D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 41 | HUANG Logan | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.