Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WONG Adrian | V V D V V V | V V V V V | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 2 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.9 | 6 | +0.1 |
| 3 | YAO Geoffrey B. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 3 | SHCHUR Landon | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 5 | SKORUPAN Grant | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
| 6 | KATS Dylan G. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 7 | IARIKOV Nicholas | D V V V D D | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 8 | ZHANG Kingston | V D V D D D | V V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 9 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | V V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
| 10 | LEE Samuel Y. | V V V V V V | V D | 2.5 | 6 | +3.5 |
| 11 | SU Caleb | V V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 12 | DODIN David | V V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 13 | KRIVAK Blaise | V V D D V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 14 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | V D V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 15 | SANTOS Francisco M. | V D V V D | V D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
| 16 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | D D D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 17 | LI Matthew | V V D V V V | D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 18 | CHEN Brian | D D V V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | PARK Nicholas | D V V V D V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 20 | BRODSKY Julian | V V D D V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 21 | JIANG Matthew | D D V V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 22 | ZELTSER Eric S. | V D V D D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 23 | WOLFE Alex | V D V D V D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 25 | RACHAMIM Jonathan | V D D V D D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 26 | LURYE Benjamin | D D V D V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 27 | HU Anton | D D D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 28 | LEE Aiden | D D D D V | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 29 | CHAI Ethan | D D D D V D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 30 | MAO Benjamin | V D D D D D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 31 | LI Lianhan | D D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 32 | LUR'YE Killian | D D D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 33 | ROLAND Mackinley | V V D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 34 | FARBER Ian S. | D V D D D V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 35 | ZAPPA Bobby | D D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 36 | SANTOS Antonio K. | D V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 37 | SICARD III Charles | D V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 38 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | D D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 39 | ZENG Andrew | D D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 40 | BRADSHAW Carter | V D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 41 | HUANG Logan | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.