Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WONG Adrian | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
| 2 | WIMMER Nathaniel P. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 88% |
| 3 | YAO Geoffrey B. | - | - | 1% | 14% | 57% | 28% | |
| 3 | SHCHUR Landon | - | - | 8% | 31% | 43% | 17% | |
| 5 | SKORUPAN Grant | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 6 | KATS Dylan G. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% |
| 7 | IARIKOV Nicholas | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 8 | ZHANG Kingston | 1% | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 9 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 10 | LEE Samuel Y. | 3% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 4% | < 1% |
| 11 | SU Caleb | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 12 | DODIN David | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
| 13 | KRIVAK Blaise | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
| 14 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 15 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 36% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 16 | CHIMOSKEY Finn D. | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% | - |
| 17 | LI Matthew | - | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
| 18 | CHEN Brian | - | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 19 | PARK Nicholas | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 20 | BRODSKY Julian | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 21 | JIANG Matthew | 1% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | ZELTSER Eric S. | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 23 | WOLFE Alex | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 25 | RACHAMIM Jonathan | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 26 | LURYE Benjamin | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 27 | HU Anton | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | LEE Aiden | 20% | 50% | 28% | 2% | - | - | |
| 29 | CHAI Ethan | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 30 | MAO Benjamin | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | LI Lianhan | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | LUR'YE Killian | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | ROLAND Mackinley | - | 3% | 22% | 43% | 28% | 4% | |
| 34 | FARBER Ian S. | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 35 | ZAPPA Bobby | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 36 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | SICARD III Charles | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 38 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 39 | ZENG Andrew | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 40 | BRADSHAW Carter | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 41 | HUANG Logan | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.