Baird Center - Milwaukee, WI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SUN Lucas | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
2 | MILINKOVIC Maksim | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
3 | RVACHEV Michael | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
3 | VOO Lucas | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 3% |
5 | MARTIN Mason | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
6 | WANG Marcus | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
7 | LI Timothy | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
8 | COHEN Joshua | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
9 | MATHES Caleb | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
10 | WILSON Ian G. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
11 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
12 | JEONG Arisu | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 7% |
13 | OSHIMA Robert | 6% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 3% | - |
14 | GARBER Robert A. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% |
15 | MUDGE Lachlan | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
16 | WU Jerry | - | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
17 | PECKENS Tyler | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% | |
18 | MOORE Alexander | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 26% |
19 | GOODMAN Benjamin | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
20 | GUO Luke | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
21 | CHAKRABORTY Zorian | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
22 | VRUBEL Eli | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
23 | LAWLOR Lee | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 31% |
24 | AYOTTE James | - | 2% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
25 | GOVOROV Alexander | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
26 | LEE Henry | 2% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
27 | ST CLAIR Soren | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
27 | POHL Philip | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
29 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 31% |
30 | BAUMAN Colin | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% | - |
31 | SPRINGER Elijah | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
32 | WEINSTEIN Ethan | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
33 | FELICIANO Damien | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
34 | SAMIMI Sina | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
35 | RUFANOV Maxim | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
36 | BANNEN Nicholas | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 37% | 17% |
37 | RAHMAN Zayd | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
38 | INGHILTERRA Luca | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
38 | LI Grayson | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% | |
40 | LEECH Braedan | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 5% |
41 | HEDGES Lux | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
42 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% | ||
43 | MITSCH Aubrey | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% | |
44 | CHIZ Max H. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | ||
45 | DELONG Joshua | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
45 | SCHWITZER Eliot | 2% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
47 | RAMEY Daylon | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
48 | JEON Kaden | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
49 | GADHVI Darius | 1% | 9% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 10% | 2% |
50 | MOSKOWITZ Martin | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 26% |
51 | JIANG Harry | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
52 | RODRIGUEZ Alex | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
53 | GAO Ryan | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
54 | REICHMANN Theo | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
55 | ARZT Nicholas | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | |
56 | DENG Destin | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
57 | KOFMAN David | - | 3% | 13% | 27% | 32% | 19% | 5% |
58 | ST.CLAIRE-KING Tenzin | - | 2% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
58 | TIEKING Noah | 6% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 11% | 2% | - |
60 | MARSH Alex | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
61 | SCHAUER Oliver | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
63 | MARTIN Dirk | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | ||
64 | BROWN Korbyn | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
65 | BRASSARD Calvin | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
66 | MA Ryan | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 4% |
67 | ZHOU alex | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
68 | SNYDER Michael T. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
69 | ROBINSON Ezekiel | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
70 | JERDEE Colton | 7% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
71 | REID Wesley | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | |
72 | DINH Nam | 1% | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
73 | FITZGERALD Thomas R. | 2% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
74 | ZHANG Jason | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
75 | DILDA Griffin | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
76 | YANG Alex | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
77 | EVANS George | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
78 | SENECHAL Alexander | - | 3% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 22% | 6% |
79 | EVANS Joseph | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
80 | VARON David | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
81 | MAGNUSON Thomas | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
82 | MORI Seneca | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 5% |
83 | HAMILTON Travis | 5% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 13% | 3% | - |
84 | NUGENT Curtis | 19% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | |
86 | SAHA Sayan | - | 3% | 13% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 5% |
86 | MATOS Adrian | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
88 | PATEL Aayan | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
89 | URCIOLI Phenix | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
89 | ASIALA Niilo | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
91 | JADHAV Tanay | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
92 | BUTTA Robert | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
93 | HANNA Alexander | 14% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
94 | MILLER Brent | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 3% |
95 | ALABI Azryl | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
96 | VARNEY Douglas W. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
97 | WHITE Aidan | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
97 | KARLEKAR Veer | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
99 | WASSERMAN Jacob | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
100 | MILLER Joshua J. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
101 | RAHMAN Ali | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
101 | KIM Remington | 1% | 8% | 23% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 2% |
103 | CHAU Collin | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
104 | PAPP Mike | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
104 | ERIZE Alex | 7% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
106 | ANDERSON Donald | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
107 | MUENKE Torben | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
108 | CZACHOROWSKI Mark | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
109 | FRALEY Orion | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | ||
110 | PAN Anthony | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
111 | BATISTA Julian | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 1% | |
111 | HALE Bradley | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
113 | WATERS Nathaniel | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | |
113 | JARRATT Isaac | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
115 | SRIKANTH Hariharan | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
116 | AU Joshua | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
117 | SARMIENTO Luke | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
118 | TENHUNDFELD Jack | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 3% |
119 | SI Anderson | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | |
120 | MEIER Nicholas M. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
121 | WONG Vansen | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
121 | ADAMS Tyler | - | 4% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
123 | VANCE Wyatt | 3% | 15% | 29% | 30% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
124 | ALVIOR Jonathan Adrian | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
125 | BUTTA Reese | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
126 | NUNEZ Jorge | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
127 | VENZON Gavin | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | 1% | - |
128 | DREWRY William | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
129 | PAULSEN Zachary | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 16% | |
130 | WILLIAMS Richard | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
131 | SOTO Michael | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
132 | STEVENS Owen | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
132 | SCOTT Alex | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 3% |
134 | BACON Corban | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
135 | MALAHOWSKI Patrick | 4% | 18% | 32% | 28% | 14% | 3% | - |
136 | FENG Xinmin | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
137 | DEPAUW Achiel | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
138 | GRANT Grayson | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
139 | ALEXANDER Christopher | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 4% |
139 | CHEN Vincent | 1% | 5% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 3% |
141 | LI Ray | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
142 | DAVIDSON James | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | |
143 | CLAYTON Byron | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 28% | |
144 | RICHMOND Ozan | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | ||
145 | WAID Ian | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
146 | VRUBEL Nathan | 13% | 32% | 32% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
147 | SATHYAN Dev | 6% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
148 | OLSON Joseph | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
149 | DOLLARHITE Tommy | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
150 | SEABLOOM Jack | 2% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 23% | 9% | 1% |
150 | BENUCCI Vincent | 10% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
152 | COLE Perrin | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
152 | MCKILLOP Matthew | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
154 | CHABIE Austin | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
155 | LOMBARD Alexander | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
157 | CHOI Daniel | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
158 | SIGGINS Wally | 34% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
159 | BOHLER-PARK Henry | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
160 | EMERSON Zachary | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
161 | GOODMAN Craig | 46% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
162 | PRICE Cory J. | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
163 | HOWE Robert | < 1% | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
164 | FRIEDMAN Andres | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 2% | - |
165 | SEYMOUR Phoenix | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
166 | MARTELL Antonio | 9% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
167 | CARCELLER Jeremias | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
168 | HARRISKING Benjamin | < 1% | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
169 | SMITH Samuel J. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
170 | GARRISON Shawn | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.