Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
2 | ABZHANOV Nurzhan | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
3 | SHARMA Sanil | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
3 | DIECK Logan O. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
5 | KHAYAT Ziad N. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
6 | WANG Joey | V V V D V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
7 | WONG Baron | V D V D D V | V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
8 | KIM Sterling S. | D V D V D V | V V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
9 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
10 | CHIEN Brandon | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
11 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
11 | ROBINSON Samuel | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
13 | YAO Geoffrey B. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
14 | TAI Edison | V D D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
15 | WU Steven | D D D V V | V V V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
16 | WILKENS Zach Q. | V D D D D D | V V V D | 4.1 | 1 | -3.1 |
17 | CHOI Zachary | V V V V V V | D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
18 | YAMASAKI Kyle A. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
19 | KHANNA Nikhil | V V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
20 | KIM Sullivan | V V V V V D | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
21 | KIM Benjamin I. | D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
22 | DILLON Anik | V V V D V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
23 | CLAWSON Brian C. | D D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
24 | DU Shunyu K. | V V D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
25 | YU Austin | D V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
26 | POLAKOSKI David R. | V V V D V D | V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
27 | MENDOZA Zandro | V D D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
28 | JOHNSTON Conner S. | D D V V V D | V D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
29 | LEE Royce | V V D D D V | V V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
30 | SANKEY Luka | V D D V V D | V V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
31 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | D D V V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
31 | MORIN-JIANG Jake | V D D V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
33 | GOHEL Dayus T. | V V V V V D | D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
34 | LOYA Fernando | V V D V V | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
35 | STEPHAN Jens | V V V D V D | D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
36 | NIXON Mark | D V V D V V | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
37 | LI Yunji (Rain) | D D V V V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
38 | LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. | V D V V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
39 | WU Johnny y. | V D V V V D | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
40 | PIVOVAROV Lucas | V V V D D V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
41 | KIM Kevin | V D V V V D | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
42 | MAXU Tiger | V V D V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
43 | JOYCE David | D V V V D D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
44 | PETERSON Matthew | D D V V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
45 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | V D V D D V | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
46 | KURITZ Marc M. | V V D D V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
47 | DENG Destin | D D D V V V | V D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
48 | TAYLOR Daryl J. | V D D D V V | V D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
49 | SMITH Justin C. | D V V V D D | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
49 | XU Thomas | V D V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
51 | TSANG Gary | V D V D V | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
52 | ALLEN David | D D D V V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
53 | FU Nolan | D V D D V V | V D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
54 | FU Leon | V D V D D | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
55 | KLINKNER Richard | D D V D V | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
56 | VOO Lucas | D D V D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
58 | ALI Adam | D V V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
59 | LEE Damien | V V D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
60 | FUNG SHAUN | D V D V D D | V D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
61 | ELLOWAY William | D V D V D D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
62 | PARKE Nathaniel | D D D V D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
63 | LIANG Donny | V D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
64 | MCALVANY Dashel | D D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
65 | KIM Remington | V D D D V V | D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
66 | SANKEY Levi | V V V D D D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
67 | HEINS Dylan | V V D D V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
68 | SOUKUP Branden | D D V D V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
69 | TANG William | V D D D D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
70 | BAILEY Creston P. | V D V D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
71 | SETTE Alessandro | D D D V D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
71 | MCLAREN Mason | D V D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
73 | HILLSTROM Nathan | D D D D V V | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 | |
74 | YI David | D V D D V D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
75 | CHOI JJ | D V D D D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
76 | ZHENG Haoran | D D D V D D | D | 4.7 | 1 | -3.7 |
77 | MARSH Timothy G. | D V D D D D | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
78 | GELNAW William (Gypsy) H. | D V D D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
79 | KNIGHT Alex | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
79 | HORN Evans | D V D D D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
81 | WAGHOLIKAR Prathit | D D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
81 | CHEONG Cameron | D D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
83 | XUE Chenming | D D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
84 | KOU Mason | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
85 | HEWITT Frank F. | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
85 | CHAO Warren | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
87 | HEISLER Brendan E. | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
88 | CREASON Nicholas | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
88 | GAYLORD Ronan | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
90 | KENO Daniel | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.