Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | LIN Richard W. | V V D V V V | V V V V V V | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
2 | CHOI Jiwoo J. | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.9 | 6 | +0.1 |
3 | ARIZA Isaac A. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
3 | KAO Castor T. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
5 | ONIK Elijah T. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
6 | LEE Joshua | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
7 | MARX Oscar L. | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
8 | NAGER Noah | D V V V V D | V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
9 | CHENG Jonathan | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
10 | PELOSKY Zack B. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
11 | PAE Jonathan L. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
12 | BAS Liam | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
12 | YANG Luao | V D V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
14 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
15 | LEE Aidan | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
16 | SHIKHMAN Robert | D D V V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
17 | PAN Eric | V V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
18 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
19 | KWON Ethan | V D V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
20 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | V V V D V V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
21 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
22 | VERSTEELE Sander | V V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
23 | PAE Brian L. | D V V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
24 | ORVANANOS Jorge | V D V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
25 | AHN Jun | V V V D V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
26 | SHA Yi Peng | D V V D V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
27 | HE Yuhao | V D D V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
28 | LI Eric | V D D V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
29 | GRAHAM Roy J. | V D V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
30 | FU Samuel Y. | D D V V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
31 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | D V V V D D | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
32 | DESOLA Aidan J. | V V D D D | V V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
33 | LI Richard | V V V V V | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
34 | BING Charles | V V D V V V | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
35 | WU Alexander | V V V V D V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
36 | QI Steve | V V D V V V | D | 2.2 | 5 | +2.8 |
37 | ALIMI Yacine A. | V V V V D | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
38 | PYO Michael M. | V D V D V V | D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
39 | LIU Eric Y. | V V V V D D | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
40 | DORAN Wesley C. | V V D D V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
41 | MENG Zhaoyi | V V D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
42 | ANTON Nathaniel | V V D D V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
43 | KEE Andrew L. | V D V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
44 | LOU Darren | V V D D V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
45 | SHIN Joshua J. | V V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
46 | LI Owen | D V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
47 | SONG Leonardo T. | V V V D D D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
47 | TIAN Aaron C. | V D D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
49 | KULKARNI Ansh A. | D D V V D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
49 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | D V D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
51 | GOOR Julian | V D D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
52 | SHADPOOR Ryan | D V V D V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
53 | LOUIE Timothy J. | D D V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
54 | CAI Oliver K. | V V D D D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
55 | VALENTON Timothy | V D V V D D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
56 | BRUK Peter J. | D D V D V | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
57 | FINN Mark T. | D V V D D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
58 | YULDASHEV Timur | V D D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
59 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | V D D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
60 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | D V D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
61 | ZHANG Yun Isaac | D V V D D D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
62 | DOUGLAS Oscar M. | D V D D D V | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
63 | HAN Lawrence | D D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
64 | MILLER Aidan A. | D D D D V D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
65 | TAHOUN Mostafa | D D D V V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
66 | WANG Gerald Y. | D D D V V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
67 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | D D D V V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
68 | MCLENDON Diego | D V V D D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
69 | BROWN Alexander R. | V D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
70 | SCHALES Peyton | D V D D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
71 | LONGENBACH Pharell J. | V D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
72 | LI Matthew | D D V V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
73 | WERWA Griffith | V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
74 | GORBACHEV Alexander | D D D D V | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
75 | DREW Nicolas | D V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
76 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | V D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
77 | LU Xiao | V D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
77 | ZHANG Zixuan "Mark" | D D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
79 | ZHENG zhe | D V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
80 | ZHANG Huaxu | D D D V D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
81 | ZHAI Jeffrey | D D V D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
82 | BAUMANN Gunnar | D D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
82 | THUMMALA Nishanth | D D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
84 | RADTKE Jakob | V D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
85 | KNIZHNIK David | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
86 | VISHNEVSKY Aden | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
87 | KANDADAI Arjun | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
88 | LI Lianhao | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
89 | DAS Nikhil | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
90 | BADLANI Dev | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
90 | TORRES Treston | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
90 | DONG sean | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
93 | IVANENKO Alex | D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
94 | BALAKIRSKIY Gabriel | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
95 | MECINSKI Henrik | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.