Escondido, CA - Escondido, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Aaron Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 2 | JEON Alexander E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | |
| 3 | WILKENS Zach Q. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% | 3% |
| 3 | SHARMA Sanil | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 5 | FARQUHARSON Cole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 21% | |
| 6 | NG Alexander M. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 7 | WEI Zikun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% |
| 8 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 7% | |
| 9 | LI Henry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 6% |
| 10 | RANGEL Arturo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 16% |
| 11 | WANG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
| 12 | VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 19% | |
| 13 | LIN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% | |
| 14 | WONG Daniel | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 15 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 16 | WELLS Tommy R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 8% | |
| 17 | WALSH Kevin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 18 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 9% |
| 19 | LIANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 12% | |
| 20 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 45% | 11% | |
| 21 | KULIGOWSKI Bartosz | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
| 22 | THOMPSON Chester | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 23 | SINGHA Orion | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 12% |
| 24 | SHUR Yakov C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 21% | |
| 25 | ZHOU Alec Q. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
| 26 | SMITH Zane A. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 27 | JIN daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 28 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 29 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 30 | ZHU Max | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 44% | 10% | |
| 31 | USHER Alexander | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 32 | FEES HOLDEN | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | LEON Sebastian | 100% | 96% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 34 | PARK Elliot | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 35 | TARBUSKOVICH III John | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
| 36 | MOHEBI Saam | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% | |
| 37 | WESTON Tom | 100% | 86% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
| 38 | HARRIS Roark S. | 100% | 89% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | MUIR Douglas K. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 40 | KIM Sterling S. | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | FOREMAN Alexander E. | 100% | 94% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | AU Marcus J. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 2% | |
| 43 | CHON Joshua | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 44 | ESTRADA Luke | 100% | 68% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 45 | YOUNG Jr Colby | 100% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | WONG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 47 | MILEY Nick N. | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | BAKER William | 100% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 49 | MCGINLEY Walker | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 50 | TAMHANKAR Neil | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 51 | BISEN Aryaman | 100% | 60% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 52 | PIROTTO Nicholas | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.